Skip to main content

Security report for gsatickets.top

Avocasino · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Avocasino3.com operates as an online casino review platform focusing on cryptocurrency-friendly casinos, providing detailed reviews, promotions, and gaming information. The site targets online casino players interested in crypto wagering and operates primarily as an affiliate marketing business. Technically, the website uses modern technologies including Angular and Tailwind CSS, with hosting and DNS services via Cloudflare. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and some security best practices observed, but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC. Privacy compliance is basic with presence of privacy and cookie policies but no explicit GDPR compliance indicators or data protection officer information. Business credibility is moderate due to lack of direct contact details and suspicious WHOIS domain data indicating a future creation date, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from improved transparency and security enhancements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gsatickets.top

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions itself as a niche player in the online casino affiliate marketing space, focusing on crypto-friendly casinos. It leverages partnerships with related domains such as pokiesreal.money and avoplay.com to enhance its offerings. Revenue likely derives from affiliate commissions and advertising. The target audience is online gamblers seeking crypto wagering options. The business is relatively new (founded 2025) and small in size, with no parent or subsidiary companies identified. The content quality is good and branding consistent, supporting a professional market presence. However, the suspicious WHOIS data and lack of direct contact information may impact trust and growth potential.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses clientTransferProhibited domain status, indicating basic security awareness. However, the absence of DNSSEC and key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options reduces its defense-in-depth posture. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, limiting transparency. Use of Hotjar introduces moderate user tracking, which should be balanced with privacy compliance. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be improved to meet higher compliance and trust standards.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and trustworthiness.
  2. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Publish explicit security and incident response policies with dedicated contact channels.
  4. Provide verified company contact emails and phone numbers to enhance business credibility.
  5. Conduct a WHOIS data review to correct inconsistencies and improve domain legitimacy perception.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Avocasino
Description
Online casino review platform providing detailed reviews, promotions, and gaming information focused on cryptocurrency-friendly casinos.
Key services
Casino reviews, Promotions information, Affiliate referrals
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Angular, Tailwind CSS, Cloudflare DNS, Hotjar
Frameworks
Angular
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar
Marketing tools
Email subscription for promotions
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.
  2. Content is focused on online casino reviews with emphasis on cryptocurrency-friendly casinos.
  3. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found on the page; contact is via contact form.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present but basic in nature.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies found.
  6. No certifications or compliance badges displayed.
  7. Use of modern frontend framework Angular and Tailwind CSS.
  8. Use of Hotjar for user behavior analytics.
  9. Domain WHOIS data shows suspicious future creation date.
  10. No DNSSEC enabled for domain.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Angular framework with Tailwind CSS for styling, indicating a modern frontend architecture. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing performance and security benefits. The site loads moderately fast and is mobile-optimized with responsive design. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and canonical URLs. However, accessibility features are basic and could be enhanced. Analytics is implemented via Hotjar for user behavior insights. No CMS detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary solution. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but has room for improvement in accessibility and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gsatickets.top. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gsatickets.top.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.