Skip to main content

Security report for gruposdeputaria.blog

Other · United States

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Gruposdeputaria.blog is a niche adult content aggregator website launched in 2024, focusing on sharing and promoting adult-themed Telegram and WhatsApp groups. The site targets Portuguese-speaking adults interested in various adult content categories such as fetishes, novinhas, and OnlyFans leaks. The business model revolves around content aggregation and user submissions without direct e-commerce or subscription services. Technically, the site is built on WordPress 6.8.1, uses common web technologies like jQuery and Google Fonts, and is hosted behind Cloudflare DNS. Performance and mobile optimization are moderate to good, but accessibility and advanced SEO features are basic. Security posture is average with HTTPS enabled but lacks DNSSEC, security headers, and incident response contacts. Privacy compliance is poor, with no visible privacy or cookie policies. Overall, the site presents basic professionalism but lacks trust and transparency indicators typical for adult content aggregators.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gruposdeputaria.blog

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention gruposdeputaria.blog, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
4
Employees
0
Customers
4
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for gruposdeputaria.blog.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website occupies a niche market segment aggregating adult content groups on popular messaging platforms. Its competitive advantage lies in daily updates and a broad range of categories catering to diverse adult interests. The business model appears to be ad-supported, leveraging third-party ad networks and analytics. The target audience is adult Portuguese speakers, likely from Brazil or Portuguese-speaking countries, despite the US domain registration. Growth potential depends on content freshness and user engagement. No partnerships or parent company affiliations are evident. The site lacks formal business credentials or certifications, which may limit trust and monetization opportunities.

Security posture

Security maturity is low to moderate. HTTPS is properly implemented, but the absence of DNSSEC and security headers exposes the site to potential DNS spoofing and clickjacking risks. No privacy or cookie policies indicate non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. The lack of incident response contacts and security policies reduces readiness for handling security incidents. The use of third-party ad and analytics scripts introduces additional privacy and security considerations. Overall, the site should prioritize implementing security best practices and compliance measures to reduce risk and enhance user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security incident response and abuse contacts.
  5. Review and secure all forms and user input points to prevent abuse and injection attacks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Site for sharing and promoting adult-themed Telegram and WhatsApp groups, focusing on various sexual content categories.
Key services
Listing and linking to adult Telegram groups, Listing and linking to adult WhatsApp groups, User account creation and group submission
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, jQuery 3.7.1, Google Web Fonts (Open Sans), Font Awesome, Cloudflare DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
45/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Histats
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
xtraffix.com, histats.com
Tracking pixels
Histats
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult content aggregator focusing on Telegram and WhatsApp groups.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No explicit contact information or business credentials provided.
  4. Uses WordPress CMS with standard plugins and Google Fonts.
  5. Includes third-party ad and analytics scripts from Histats and xtraffix.com.
  6. No advanced security headers or incident response info visible.
  7. Domain is new and privacy protected, typical for this niche.
  8. Content is accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a standard WordPress CMS with version 6.8.1 and common JavaScript libraries like jQuery. Google Fonts and Font Awesome are used for styling and icons. Hosting details are partially obscured but DNS is managed via Cloudflare. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of fonts and scripts. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility features are minimal. SEO is enhanced by Yoast SEO plugin with proper meta tags and structured data. The site includes third-party ad and analytics scripts which may impact privacy. No advanced frameworks or platforms detected. Technical debt appears low but security and privacy technical implementations need improvement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gruposdeputaria.blog. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gruposdeputaria.blog.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.