Skip to main content

Security report for grtu.eu

Other · N/a

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

38/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GRTU.eu is a Dutch language startpagina website that functions as a curated link directory offering categorized external links across various topics such as technology, baby products, pets, finance, and more. The site targets Dutch-speaking users seeking a centralized resource for useful links. The business model is primarily informational, aggregating links to partner and external sites without direct e-commerce or transactional services. The market position is niche and local, with a small scale operation indicated by the limited content and lack of extensive business information. Technically, the website uses Alpine.js for front-end interactivity and has a responsive design suitable for mobile devices. However, there is no evidence of a CMS or advanced frameworks, and performance is moderate. SEO and accessibility features are basic, with minimal meta tags and no structured data or Open Graph tags detected. The site lacks HTTPS information in the provided data, which is a critical security concern. From a security perspective, the site does not display privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies, nor does it provide contact information for security incidents or data protection officers. No security headers or vulnerability disclosures are present. The absence of HTTPS and security headers significantly lowers the security posture. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal user tracking but also a lack of privacy compliance mechanisms. Overall, the website presents a moderate risk profile due to missing security best practices and compliance documentation. Strategic recommendations include implementing HTTPS, adding privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms, enhancing security headers, and providing clear contact information for security and privacy concerns. These steps will improve trustworthiness, compliance, and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching grtu.eu

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
50
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
0
Average
38

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GRTU.eu operates as a startpagina, a Dutch-style link directory, aggregating categorized links to various external websites across multiple sectors such as automotive, baby products, pets, finance, entertainment, and more. The business model is informational and likely monetized through affiliate links or advertising partnerships, although no explicit ad networks or tracking were detected. The target audience is Dutch-speaking internet users seeking a centralized resource for diverse topics. The site maintains a consistent brand and offers multiple subsidiary domains focused on specific categories. The lack of detailed company information, certifications, or contact emails suggests a small-scale operation with limited transparency. The partnership ecosystem appears broad but primarily consists of external links rather than formal partnerships. Growth indicators and revenue streams are not discernible from the content.

Security posture

The website's security maturity is low due to the absence of HTTPS information, security headers, privacy and cookie policies, and incident response contacts. No vulnerability disclosures or security certifications are present. The lack of secure forms or input fields reduces attack surface but also indicates limited interactive functionality. Compliance with GDPR or other data protection regulations is not demonstrated. The site does not appear to collect personal data directly, which may reduce compliance risk but does not exempt it from providing privacy information. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not visible. Overall, the security posture requires significant improvement to meet modern standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all site traffic.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements and consent mechanisms.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  4. Provide explicit contact information for security incidents, including abuse@ or security@ email addresses.
  5. Conduct a security audit to identify and remediate potential vulnerabilities and improve overall security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
GRTU.eu is een startpagina. Wij bieden een overzicht van alle handige links, en dat op 1 startpagina.
Key services
Curated categorized links to various topics and partner sites
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Alpine.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Dutch language startpagina (link directory) with categorized external links.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the main page.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly listed on the homepage; contact form exists on a separate contact page.
  4. No security or incident response policies visible.
  5. Uses Alpine.js library for UI interactivity.
  6. No visible analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  7. No HTTPS or security headers information available from provided data.
  8. No structured data (JSON-LD) or Open Graph meta tags present.
  9. Website content is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Alpine.js (version 2.7.3) for front-end interactivity and is built with standard HTML and CSS. The design is responsive and mobile-friendly, with a clear navigation structure. No CMS or backend technologies are evident from the HTML content. Performance is moderate, with no heavy scripts or tracking detected. SEO is basic, with minimal meta tags and no structured data or Open Graph tags. Accessibility features are limited but present at a basic level. Hosting provider and SSL configuration details are not available from the provided data. There is an opportunity to modernize the tech stack, improve SEO and accessibility, and implement security best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with grtu.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review grtu.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.