Skip to main content

Security report for grm.ie

Glenbeigh Records Management · Other · Ireland

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

31/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Glenbeigh Records Management (GRM) is a well-established Irish company specializing in secure records management and digital transformation services. Founded in 2004 and headquartered in Dublin, GRM serves a broad client base across public and private sectors including healthcare, legal, financial services, and government agencies. The company offers comprehensive services such as off-site document storage, digitisation, secure shredding, and digital mailroom management, supported by advanced infrastructure including a high-security oxygen-reduction fire vault. Their international expansion includes a major facility in Dubai, enhancing their regional footprint. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern technologies like jQuery, Google Analytics, and reCAPTCHA integrated for security and analytics. The site is well-optimized for SEO, mobile-friendly, and accessible, reflecting a mature digital presence. Security posture is strong, with HTTPS enforced, ISO 27001 certification, and secure handling of client data, although some security headers could be improved. Overall, GRM demonstrates a high level of professionalism, compliance, and trustworthiness. The website provides clear contact information, privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms, and showcases client testimonials and certifications, reinforcing credibility. No blocking or WAF interference was detected, allowing full content access and analysis.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
15/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching grm.ie

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
25
Email security
55
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
15
Average
31

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GRM holds a strong market position as a trusted provider of records management and digitisation services in Ireland and the Middle East. Their business model focuses on B2B services with a diversified client base across multiple regulated sectors. The company leverages certifications and advanced infrastructure as competitive advantages. Their partnership with Matrix Internet for website development and use of modern web technologies indicate a commitment to digital maturity. Growth indicators include international expansion and a large client base. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to enhance incident response transparency and security header implementation to further strengthen trust.

Security posture

The security maturity of GRM is solid, evidenced by ISO 27001 certification and secure physical infrastructure. The website enforces HTTPS and uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms. However, some standard security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not explicitly detected, representing an area for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the analysis. Incident response information is not publicly available, which could be enhanced to improve readiness and client confidence. Overall, the security culture appears strong but could benefit from increased transparency and technical hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify comprehensive security headers including CSP, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  2. Publish a dedicated incident response page with security contact details to improve transparency.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance visibility of Data Protection Officer contact information to support GDPR compliance.
  5. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Glenbeigh Records Management Limited
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Glenbeigh Records Management
Description
Glenbeigh Records Management (GRM) is a leading Irish company specializing in secure records and information management services including document storage, scanning, shredding, and digital transformation. Established in 2004 and headquartered in Dublin, it serves over 750 organizations across public and private sectors with a modern secure facility and international presence in Dubai.
Key services
Off-site document storage, Oxygen-reduced vault storage, Media storage, Document scanning and digitisation, Digital mailroom management, Certified secure shredding and destruction
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google Analytics, Google reCAPTCHA, Swiper.js, Photoswipe
Frameworks
Rank Math SEO, Contact Form 7
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms
  • ISO 27001 certification
  • Secure document storage with biometric access and fire vault
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Rank Math SEO, Cookie Script
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Strong emphasis on security and compliance with ISO certifications.
  3. Comprehensive service offerings in records management and digital transformation.
  4. Active social media presence on major platforms.
  5. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented and accessible.
  6. No signs of blocking or WAF interference.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using a child theme with modern front-end libraries such as jQuery, Swiper.js, and Photoswipe for enhanced user experience. SEO is managed via Rank Math plugin, and forms are protected with Google reCAPTCHA. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. The site uses a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. Hosting provider details are not explicitly disclosed. Technical risks are minimal but include the absence of some security headers and potential reliance on third-party scripts. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business goals effectively with room for incremental security improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with grm.ie. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review grm.ie.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.