Skip to main content

Security report for griller.at

Gebauer & Griller · Manufacturing · Austria

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Gebauer & Griller (GG Group) is a well-established international family-owned manufacturing group specializing in high-quality wires, cables, and wiring systems for automotive and industrial applications. The company positions itself as a leading provider in energy and data transmission sectors, emphasizing customized solutions, innovation, and strong partnerships. The website reflects a professional digital presence with comprehensive content, including corporate videos, social media integration, and detailed product and corporate information. Technically, the site is built on TYPO3 CMS with modern JavaScript libraries and integrates third-party services such as Google reCAPTCHA, Google Maps, Vimeo, and Flockler social feeds. However, the website currently lacks a valid SSL certificate and does not support modern TLS protocols, which is a critical security concern. Security headers are partially implemented, but important features like HSTS and OCSP stapling are missing. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies and a consent mechanism. Contact information is comprehensive, including multiple global office addresses, emails, and phone numbers. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but requires urgent improvements in SSL/TLS security to protect user data and maintain trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
33/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching griller.at

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
40
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
33
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GG Group operates in the manufacturing sector with a focus on automotive and industrial cable solutions. Its business model revolves around providing tailored wiring and cable systems, supported by strong R&D and innovation management. The company has a global footprint with subsidiaries and offices across Europe, North America, and Asia, indicating a large enterprise scale. The website content and structure suggest a mature organization with a clear market position as a technology leader in its niche. The presence of a whistleblowing platform and detailed legal pages indicates compliance awareness. The company leverages partnerships and maintains a professional brand image through social media and multimedia content. Growth potential is supported by continuous innovation and open innovation initiatives.

Security posture

The website demonstrates basic security hygiene with some security headers and secure cookie attributes. However, the absence of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols severely undermine the security posture, exposing users to risks such as data interception and man-in-the-middle attacks. The lack of HSTS and OCSP stapling further weakens the HTTPS implementation. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are publicly available, which could be improved to enhance transparency and trust. The cookie consent mechanism and privacy policy indicate GDPR compliance efforts. Overall, the security posture is weak due to critical SSL/TLS deficiencies but shows some compliance and best practice awareness.

Recommendations

  1. Immediately obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Enable and enforce modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3) and disable all insecure protocols.
  3. Implement HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload directives.
  4. Enable OCSP stapling to improve certificate revocation checking performance and security.
  5. Publish a clear security policy and vulnerability disclosure program to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  6. Regularly audit and update security headers and cookie settings to align with best practices.
  7. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  8. Continue maintaining comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear consent mechanisms.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Gebauer & Griller
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on an Apache server and built using TYPO3 CMS, a mature and flexible content management system. It uses jQuery and integrates several third-party services including Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection, Google Maps for location display, Vimeo for video content, and Flockler for social media feeds. The DNS setup uses A records pointing to a single IPv4 address and Microsoft Outlook for email protection. The site lacks a valid SSL certificate and does not support any TLS versions, which is a critical technical deficiency. Performance metrics are missing or zero, indicating potential monitoring gaps. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good navigation clarity. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Hosting appears to be managed by A1.net based on DNS nameservers. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but requires urgent security upgrades and performance monitoring.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with griller.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review griller.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.