Skip to main content

Security report for griffithfoods.com

Griffith Foods · Manufacturing · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Griffith Foods is a global leader in food product development and innovation, specializing in creating delicious, healthy, sustainable, and nutritious food solutions for top brands worldwide. Their website reflects a mature and professional business with a clear focus on culinary craftsmanship and sustainability. The company targets food industry professionals and partners seeking customized product development services. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and Cookiebot, ensuring good digital maturity and user experience. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and clientTransferProhibited domain status, though there is room for improvement in security headers and explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is well addressed with comprehensive privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the website is trustworthy, well-branded, and professionally maintained.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching griffithfoods.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
70
Email security
78
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
68
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention griffithfoods.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
147
Employees
20
Customers
13
Third parties
114
Weak passwords
4%

Latest record dated 2026-06-14 · 2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for griffithfoods.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –fs.griffithfoods.com2026-06-14
  • –fs.griffithfoods.com2026-05-27
  • –fs.griffithfoods.com2026-05-25
  • –fs.griffithfoods.com2026-05-11
  • –fs.griffithfoods.com2026-04-20

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Griffith Foods operates in the manufacturing sector with a focus on food product development and innovation. Their business model is B2B, serving global food brands with customized solutions from ideation to production. The company demonstrates strong market positioning through sustainability initiatives and culinary expertise. The website supports multiple languages and regions, indicating a broad international presence. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the homepage suggests a controlled communication channel, likely via contact forms. The company leverages a partner ecosystem for analytics and marketing but does not expose sensitive business or security information publicly.

Security posture

The website exhibits a good security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and domain status set to clientTransferProhibited, reducing risk of unauthorized domain transfers. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended security enhancement. Security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Content-Type-Options are not detected, representing an area for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found in the HTML content. The site uses cookie consent tools compliant with GDPR, but lacks a published security policy or incident response contact information. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from additional hardening and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement Content-Security-Policy and other security headers to mitigate XSS and clickjacking risks.
  3. Publish a formal security policy and incident response contact details to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Griffith Foods
Description
At Griffith Foods, we specialize in product development for foods that consumers love and our partners can take pride in. We create delicious food that is healthy, sustainable and nutritious.
Key services
Product development, Culinary craftsmanship, Sustainability consulting, Customized food solutions
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Gravity Forms, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Cookiebot, Iubenda, jQuery, WebFont Loader, Plyr Video Player
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
Cookiebot, Iubenda
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  2. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  3. No exposed sensitive data or obvious security vulnerabilities.
  4. No security.txt or explicit security policy found.
  5. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and consistent ownership.
  6. Website content is professional and business-oriented.
  7. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  8. Good mobile optimization and accessibility features.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern and well-maintained technology stack including jQuery, Gravity Forms, and Plyr video player. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and LinkedIn Insight Tag, indicating a mature digital marketing strategy. Hosting appears to leverage a CDN (BunnyCDN) for performance optimization. The site is mobile-optimized with good accessibility and SEO practices including structured data (JSON-LD) and Open Graph metadata. Performance is moderate, with some room for improvement in load times and resource optimization. The technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable online presence suitable for a large enterprise.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with griffithfoods.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review griffithfoods.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.