Skip to main content

Security report for griestupasaule.lv

Other · N/a

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website griestupasaule.lv is currently inactive and displays a payment expiration notice from the uKit platform, indicating that the site owner has not paid for hosting or service continuation. No business information, contact details, or content describing the company or its services is available. The site uses standard tracking technologies such as Google Analytics and Yandex Metrika, but no privacy or cookie policies are present to inform users about data collection or compliance. The lack of WHOIS data due to query limits prevents verification of domain registration details, further reducing trustworthiness. Overall, the site is non-functional and provides no meaningful business or security information. From a technical perspective, the site is built on the uKit platform with Bootstrap CSS and RequireJS libraries. The performance and mobile optimization are basic, and SEO is poor due to minimal content and no metadata beyond the payment notice. No security headers or HTTPS status could be confirmed, and no forms or input fields are present, limiting attack surface but also functionality. Security posture is weak due to the absence of HTTPS confirmation, security headers, and privacy compliance indicators. The site is effectively blocked from normal use, which severely limits any security or business analysis. No vulnerabilities or incident response information is available. The domain's legitimacy cannot be assessed without WHOIS data, and the site’s current state suggests it is not operational. Overall, the website poses minimal risk due to inactivity but also offers no trust signals or business credibility. Strategic recommendations include restoring service with proper payment, implementing HTTPS and security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and providing clear business and contact information to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching griestupasaule.lv

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention griestupasaule.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for griestupasaule.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the website's inactive status and lack of content, no meaningful business intelligence can be derived. The site appears to have been hosted on the uKit platform but is currently suspended for non-payment. There is no information on market positioning, business model, revenue streams, or partnerships. The absence of contact details and company information suggests the business is either dormant or not actively maintained. No growth indicators or strategic insights are available.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is poor. The site lacks visible HTTPS enforcement confirmation and security headers, which are critical for protecting user data and preventing common web attacks. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating non-compliance with GDPR or similar regulations. The site does not provide any incident response or vulnerability disclosure information. The use of third-party analytics without consent mechanisms further weakens privacy compliance. The inactive status reduces immediate risk but also indicates poor security hygiene and operational management.

Recommendations

  1. Restore website hosting service and ensure continuous payment to avoid service suspension.
  2. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure data transmission.
  3. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users about data collection.
  5. Provide clear business contact information and security incident response contacts to enhance trust and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

None detected. Website content is blocked due to non-payment; no WAF or security challenge detected. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Description
The website is currently inactive and displays a payment expiration notice from the uKit platform. No business description or services are provided.
Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Yandex Metrika, Bootstrap CSS, RequireJS, uKit platform
Platforms
uKit
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Yandex Metrika
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Yandex Metrika
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is inactive and displays a payment expiration notice from uKit platform.
  2. No business or contact information is available on the site.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  5. Site uses Google Analytics and Yandex Metrika for tracking.
  6. No security headers or HTTPS status could be determined.
  7. No forms or data collection fields present.
  8. No social media or contact emails found.
  9. Content is minimal and blocked due to non-payment.
  10. No evidence of WAF or security challenge mechanisms.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the uKit platform, incorporating Bootstrap CSS for styling and RequireJS for JavaScript module loading. It integrates Google Analytics and Yandex Metrika for visitor tracking. The site currently serves a minimal HTML page indicating payment expiration, with no dynamic content or forms. Performance is moderate given the minimal content, but mobile optimization and accessibility are basic. SEO is poor due to lack of metadata and content. No hosting provider details or SSL configuration could be determined from the provided data. The technical stack is modern but underutilized due to site inactivity.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with griestupasaule.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review griestupasaule.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.