Skip to main content

Security report for greenwiremedia.com

Green Wire Media · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Green Wire Media is a small, established digital marketing and web development agency founded in 2008. They offer a broad range of services including website development, SEO, PPC campaigns, consulting, and white label solutions for agencies. The company operates fully remotely and emphasizes fair pricing and client satisfaction. Their market position is that of a reliable service provider with a focus on quality and measurable results. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using Elementor and Yoast SEO, with integrations for Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and other marketing tools. The site is mobile optimized and performs moderately well. Security posture is good with HTTPS and domain transfer protection, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is basic with a cookie consent banner but no visible privacy policy or terms of service pages. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but could improve transparency and security documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching greenwiremedia.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets businesses in the USA, Canada, and Europe, focusing on SaaS, travel agencies, local businesses, eCommerce, and online businesses. Their business model is service-based, delivering digital marketing and web solutions remotely. They maintain a portfolio of clients and active social media channels, enhancing their market presence. The use of white label services indicates a B2B partnership strategy. Growth indicators include a diverse service offering and multi-language site support. The company leverages multiple marketing and analytics tools to optimize campaigns and client results.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses domain transfer protection, which are positive security indicators. However, it lacks DNSSEC and does not publish a security policy or incident response contacts. The presence of multiple third-party tracking scripts increases the attack surface and privacy risks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The cookie consent mechanism is implemented but privacy policy and terms of service are missing, which is a compliance gap. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be improved with better headers, policies, and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages.
  3. Add a security policy and incident response contact information (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email).
  4. Implement security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  5. Regularly audit and minimize third-party tracking scripts to reduce privacy risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Green Wire Media
Description
Partner with Green Wire Media for strategic digital marketing, custom website solutions, and measurable results—delivered by seasoned web experts. They focus on digital marketing, website creation, consulting, and white label services.
Key services
Website development, Dedicated project management, Support & maintenance, Mobile responsive design, Paid ads, SEO, Consulting, White label services, Figma to WordPress conversion, QuickSite launch
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, Complianz GDPR plugin, jQuery, React (mentioned for some websites), Figma (design to WordPress conversion service)
Frameworks
Elementor, Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, VisitorQueue
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, VisitorQueue, Leadsy AI
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, VisitorQueue, Leadsy AI
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses WordPress with Elementor and Yoast SEO plugins.
  2. Cookie consent is implemented with Complianz plugin and opt-in mechanism.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage or footer.
  5. Multiple third-party tracking and marketing scripts are used.
  6. Social media presence is active with Facebook, LinkedIn, Instagram, and YouTube links.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. No explicit security policy or incident response information available.
  9. Website content is professional and well-structured with clear service offerings.
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder and Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a mature and maintainable technical stack. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools, including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, and VisitorQueue, enabling extensive user tracking and campaign management. The site is mobile optimized and uses Cloudflare for DNS and CDN services, enhancing performance and security. Performance is moderate, with some potential for optimization. The site lacks advanced accessibility features but has basic compliance. Technical debt appears low, but improvements in security headers and privacy documentation are recommended to reduce risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with greenwiremedia.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review greenwiremedia.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.