Skip to main content

Security report for greenscreen.network

Green Screen Coalition · Other · Saint Kitts and Nevis

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Green Screen Coalition is a small non-profit organization founded in 2023, focused on the intersection of climate justice and digital rights. They operate primarily as a grantmaking and educational coalition, providing a Catalyst Fund to support projects, maintaining a library of resources, and publishing a blog to engage their community. Their market position is niche, targeting individuals and organizations interested in environmental and digital rights advocacy. The website is professionally designed with good mobile optimization and accessibility, hosted on privacy-conscious infrastructure with Njalla nameservers. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacking advanced security headers and DNSSEC. Privacy compliance is basic, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism or terms of service page. Contact information is limited to email addresses, with no phone or physical address provided. Overall, the website is trustworthy and functional but could improve in security and privacy transparency.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of greenscreen.network. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching greenscreen.network

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
25
Email security
60
DNS health
55
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention greenscreen.network, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for greenscreen.network right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the non-profit sector, focusing on climate justice and digital rights, which positions it in a specialized advocacy niche. Their business model revolves around grantmaking and knowledge dissemination rather than commercial revenue. The presence of partnerships or references to entities like the Ariadne Network and Mozilla Foundation suggests a collaborative ecosystem. The domain registration in Saint Kitts and Nevis may reflect operational or privacy considerations common in small NGOs. The website's content and structure indicate a clear target audience of activists, researchers, and funders interested in environmental and digital rights issues. Growth indicators include active blog updates and a newsletter subscription. The absence of phone contact and physical address may limit some trust signals but is not uncommon for small non-profits.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications, but lacks DNSSEC and common security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate certain attack vectors. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response contacts are provided, limiting transparency in security management. The forms present use basic anti-spam hidden fields but no advanced protections. No analytics or tracking scripts reduce privacy risks but also limit user behavior insights. Overall, the security maturity is moderate, suitable for a small non-profit but with room for improvement to align with best practices and compliance frameworks.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Add a cookie consent mechanism and a dedicated cookie policy page to enhance privacy compliance.
  4. Publish a terms of service page to clarify user rights and obligations.
  5. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve incident response readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Green Screen Coalition
Description
A catalyst in making visible the climate implications of technology by supporting emerging on-the-ground work, building networks, and embedding the issue area within philanthropy.
Key services
Catalyst Fund grantmaking, Educational library, Blog and communications
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data
  • Secure form with anti-spam hidden field

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on climate justice and digital rights with educational and grantmaking services.
  3. No cookie consent mechanism or explicit cookie policy found.
  4. No terms of service page detected.
  5. Contact information limited to email addresses; no phone or physical address found.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  7. Use of Njalla nameservers suggests privacy-conscious hosting.
  8. No social media links except GitLab repository link.
  9. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  10. Good mobile optimization and accessibility features present.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses standard modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript with no detected CMS or heavy frameworks. Hosting is via Njalla, a privacy-focused provider, indicated by the nameservers. Performance is moderate with no explicit performance optimization scripts detected. The site is mobile responsive and includes accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA labels. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. No analytics or tracking scripts were found, indicating minimal user tracking. The technical stack is simple and effective for the site's purpose but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 64/100Medium34 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with greenscreen.network. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review greenscreen.network.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.