Skip to main content

Security report for greenandresilienteconomics.org

Macroeconomics of Green and Resilient Transitions · Government · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Macroeconomics of Green and Resilient Transitions website serves as a collaborative platform primarily aimed at Ministries of Finance and associated researchers and practitioners focused on climate finance and economic policy. It provides a compendium of practical tools, publications, and community engagement to support green and resilient economic transitions. The site is backed by reputable academic and governmental institutions, notably the London School of Economics and the Coalition of Finance Ministers for Climate Action, positioning it as a trusted resource in its niche. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern web technologies including Bootstrap and jQuery, enhanced by SEO plugins and Adobe Fonts. It employs Google Analytics for user tracking but lacks a cookie consent mechanism, which is a privacy compliance gap. The site is mobile-optimized and demonstrates good accessibility and SEO practices, though performance is moderate. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and domain registration protections but lacks DNSSEC and explicit security headers, which are recommended for enhanced security. No direct contact emails or phone numbers are publicly listed, with contact facilitated via a form. There is no visible security policy or incident response information, which could be improved to bolster trust and compliance. Overall, the website is professional, content-rich, and trustworthy, with minor technical and compliance improvements recommended to enhance security posture and privacy adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching greenandresilienteconomics.org

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention greenandresilienteconomics.org, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for greenandresilienteconomics.org right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website occupies a specialized niche at the intersection of government finance and climate action, leveraging partnerships with academic and international finance coalitions. Its business model is non-commercial, focusing on knowledge dissemination and capacity building. The platform aggregates contributions from over 70 institutions, indicating a broad partnership ecosystem and collaborative approach. The target audience is well-defined, and the site’s content and structure support its mission effectively. Growth potential lies in expanding community engagement and enhancing digital tools for economic analysis. Revenue streams are not evident, consistent with a non-profit or academic initiative. The partnership with LSE and other finance ministries adds credibility and market positioning as a leading resource in green macroeconomic transitions. Strategic observations include the need for enhanced privacy compliance and security transparency to maintain trust in an increasingly regulated environment.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain status protections in place. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents gaps that could expose the site to DNS spoofing or clickjacking attacks. The lack of a published security policy or incident response plan reduces transparency and preparedness for security incidents. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content analysis. Compliance with GDPR is partially evidenced by the presence of a privacy policy, but the lack of cookie consent mechanisms and explicit data protection officer contact information indicates room for improvement. The site’s security culture could be enhanced by publishing clear security and incident response information and implementing recommended technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and publish explicit security policies and incident response procedures on the website.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  4. Introduce a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with GDPR and improve user privacy transparency.
  5. Provide clear contact information for data protection officer or privacy/security contacts to enhance compliance and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Macroeconomics of Green and Resilient Transitions
Description
This website supports Ministries of Finance in driving green and resilient economic transitions by providing economic analysis, practical guidance, and tools. It showcases contributions from a coalition of finance ministries and a broader community of researchers and practitioners.
Key services
Compendium of Practice, Publications, Community forum, Economic analysis tools and guidance
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery, Bootstrap (implied by navbar classes), Adobe Fonts (Typekit), Google Analytics (gtag.js)
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientDeleteProhibited domain status
  • ClientRenewProhibited domain status
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • ClientUpdateProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Content is focused on economic analysis for green and resilient transitions.
  3. Strong academic and governmental collaboration evident.
  4. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity.
  5. No explicit privacy or security policy pages beyond LSE's general policies.
  6. No cookie consent mechanism detected despite use of tracking scripts.
  7. No direct contact emails or phone numbers publicly listed; contact via form only.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  9. No DNSSEC enabled for domain.
  10. Use of Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform with a well-structured theme and uses popular libraries such as jQuery and Bootstrap for responsive design. SEO is enhanced via the Yoast SEO plugin, and fonts are served via Adobe Typekit. Google Analytics is integrated for visitor tracking. The site loads with moderate performance, likely due to image sizes and multiple external resources. Technical debt appears low with no broken links or errors detected. Opportunities for modernization include adopting HTTP/2 or HTTP/3 if not already in place, optimizing images for faster load times, and implementing advanced security headers. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified beyond the registrar, but domain registration is managed by GoDaddy with strong domain status flags. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and accessible user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with greenandresilienteconomics.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review greenandresilienteconomics.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.