Great Sales Force GmbH · Other · Austria
High risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.
Great Sales Force GmbH is a consulting and survey tools provider specializing in enhancing sales force effectiveness and customer intelligence. The company offers a suite of proprietary tools and services such as the GSF® Survey Tools, Benchmark Data, Consulting, and specialized checks for customer culture, leadership, CRM, and customer experience. Their market position is that of a niche provider with international reach, serving businesses aiming to improve sales performance and customer satisfaction. The website is professionally designed, content-rich, and well-branded, targeting business clients primarily in Austria and German-speaking regions. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using Elementor and Yoast SEO, with integrations like Google Tag Manager and Google reCAPTCHA v3 for tracking and form security. Hosting is provided by Hetzner, a reputable provider. However, the site suffers from critical security shortcomings, notably the absence of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS support, which severely impacts the security posture and user trust. Performance metrics are not available, but the site shows good mobile optimization and basic accessibility. Security-wise, while some best practices like cookie consent and reCAPTCHA are implemented, the lack of HTTPS and modern TLS protocols is a major vulnerability. No advanced security headers or incident response policies are found. Privacy compliance is strong with comprehensive policies and GDPR adherence. Contact information is clearly provided, enhancing business credibility. Overall, the site presents a trustworthy and professional business front but requires urgent security improvements to protect user data and enhance trust. Strategic recommendations include immediate SSL deployment, enabling modern TLS, and enhancing security headers and monitoring.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data
What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception
What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
Prevents clickjacking attacks
What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention greatsalesforce.com, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for greatsalesforce.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with greatsalesforce.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review greatsalesforce.com.