Skip to main content

Security report for greatplacetowork.no

Great Place to Work® Institute Norge · Other · Norway

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Great Place to Work® Institute Norge is a recognized consulting and certification organization focused on workplace culture improvement in Norway. They provide employee surveys, pulse measurements, advisory services, and certification programs to help businesses enhance their employer branding and workplace environment. The company leverages a platform built on decades of research and global benchmarking data, positioning itself as a leader in the Norwegian market for workplace culture and trust index services. Technically, the website is built on HubSpot CMS with modern marketing and analytics integrations, providing a good user experience and mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and consent mechanisms, though some security headers and policies could be improved. Overall, the domain is privacy protected, which is typical for this business type, and no suspicious indicators were found. The website demonstrates professionalism, trustworthiness, and compliance with privacy regulations.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of greatplacetowork.no. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching greatplacetowork.no

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
45
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the consulting and certification sector, targeting organizations seeking to improve workplace culture and employee engagement. Their business model revolves around service offerings including surveys, certification, and advisory, supported by a strong brand presence and global affiliation with Great Place to Work® Institute Inc. The website showcases client logos and certifications, indicating a solid partnership ecosystem. Marketing efforts include extensive use of analytics and retargeting tools, reflecting a mature digital marketing strategy. The company appears medium-sized with a focus on the Norwegian market, leveraging global research and benchmarking data to maintain competitive advantage.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses multiple tracking and marketing scripts responsibly with consent mechanisms in place. However, it lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a public security policy or incident response contact reduces transparency but is not uncommon for this sector. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved by publishing security policies and adding security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to improve web security.
  3. Create and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure no vulnerabilities or privacy issues arise.
  5. Enhance transparency around data retention policies and user privacy to strengthen GDPR compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Great Place to Work® Institute Norge
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Great Place to Work® Institute Norge
Description
Vi hjelper virksomheter å oppnå forretningsmessige ambisjoner og målsetninger gjennom å skape en attraktiv arbeidsplass hvor mennesker står i fokus.
Key services
Medarbeiderundersøkelse (Employee surveys), Pulsmåling (Pulse surveys), Rådgivning (Consulting), Sertifisering (Certification), Employer Branding, Emprising, Kultur og ledelse (Culture and leadership), Nasjonal Tillitsindex (National Trust Index)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HubSpot CMS, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Inzynk Tag
Platforms
HubSpot
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of consent management for cookies

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, HubSpot Analytics, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
HubSpot Marketing, Inzynk Tag
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content
  2. No WHOIS data available, indicating privacy protection
  3. Strong branding and consistent design
  4. Multiple social media and marketing integrations
  5. No visible security policy or incident response info
  6. Good privacy and cookie policy presence
  7. No critical security issues detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on HubSpot CMS, integrating Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and Inzynk marketing tags. The site uses modern HTML5 and CSS with responsive design for mobile optimization. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by multiple third-party scripts. SEO is well addressed with meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA attributes are present, indicating good compliance. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable digital presence with room for performance optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 71/100Medium28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with greatplacetowork.no. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review greatplacetowork.no.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.