Skip to main content

Security report for greatplacetowork.com.br

Great Place To Work (GPTW) · Other · Brazil

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Great Place To Work (GPTW) is a consultancy focused on workplace culture, providing services and information to companies and HR professionals in Brazil. The website serves as a portal to educate about the importance of workplace culture and how to engage GPTW's consultancy services. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Elementor and uses a modern tech stack including jQuery, Algolia search, and multiple marketing and analytics tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Hotjar. The hosting infrastructure is based on Amazon AWS DNS servers, indicating a reliable hosting environment. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and uses asynchronous loading for tracking scripts, but lacks explicit security headers and does not provide privacy or cookie policies, which are critical for GDPR compliance. No contact emails or phone numbers are found in the provided content, limiting direct communication channels. Overall, the website is professional and well-structured but could improve privacy compliance and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching greatplacetowork.com.br

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
30
Email security
75
DNS health
55
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GPTW holds a recognized position in the workplace culture consultancy sector in Brazil, targeting companies seeking to improve their organizational environment. The business model revolves around consultancy services, certification, and events. The website content and metadata reflect a consistent brand image and good SEO practices. The use of advanced search and marketing tools suggests a focus on digital engagement and lead generation. However, the absence of explicit contact information and privacy policies may hinder trust and compliance. There is no indication of parent or subsidiary companies in the provided data.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and use of reputable analytics and marketing scripts. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are provided, which limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. The extensive use of tracking scripts indicates a high level of user data collection, but without visible privacy or cookie consent mechanisms, this raises compliance concerns.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Provide explicit contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve trust and communication.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact channels to demonstrate security maturity.
  5. Review and optimize tracking and marketing scripts to ensure user privacy and compliance with data protection regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Great Place To Work (GPTW)
Description
Portal providing information about Great Place To Work (GPTW), a consultancy focused on workplace culture, its importance, impacts on companies, and how to hire their services.
Key services
Consultancy on workplace culture, Certification as a Great Place To Work, Events and training related to organizational culture
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Underscore.js, Algolia Search, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Google Tag Manager, Smart Slider 3, Elementor
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Facebook Pixel and Google Tag Manager with async loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
Algolia Search, Smart Slider 3
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided content.
  3. Multiple tracking and marketing scripts are used, indicating extensive user tracking.
  4. No direct contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found in the provided HTML content.
  5. Website uses WordPress CMS with Elementor and various plugins.
  6. Good SEO metadata and structured data are implemented.
  7. No explicit security headers detected in the provided data.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using Elementor and several plugins including Smart Slider 3 and Algolia search integration. It uses jQuery and Underscore.js libraries, and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and LinkedIn Insight Tag. Hosting is supported by Amazon AWS DNS infrastructure. The site shows good SEO optimization with proper meta tags and structured JSON-LD data. Mobile optimization is good, and the site loads scripts asynchronously to improve performance. However, no explicit accessibility features were detected, and security headers are missing. The site performance is moderate, with opportunities to enhance security and privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 61/100Medium33 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with greatplacetowork.com.br. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review greatplacetowork.com.br.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.