Skip to main content

Security report for gray-robinson.com

GrayRobinson · Government · United States

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

83/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GrayRobinson is a well-established Florida-based law firm providing integrated legal, lobbying, and regulatory services to a broad range of clients including businesses, government entities, and entrepreneurs. The firm emphasizes agility and embedded local, state, and federal advocacy, positioning itself as a multidimensional professional team with over fifty years of service. Their market position is strong within Florida and Washington, D.C., supported by a large network of offices and professionals. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies such as Foundation CSS, Google Tag Manager, and HTML5 video, delivering a professional and responsive user experience with good SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though some security headers and explicit policies are not evident. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a notable anomaly that slightly impacts trustworthiness but does not detract from the professional presentation and content quality. Overall, the site is safe, trustworthy, and well-suited for its target audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gray-robinson.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
75
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
83

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The firm operates in the legal and government sectors, targeting clients requiring legal counsel, lobbying, and regulatory services. Their business model is service-oriented, leveraging expertise across multiple practice areas and geographic locations. The firm’s competitive advantage lies in its integrated approach and deep local and federal connections. Revenue streams likely include legal fees, lobbying contracts, and consulting services. The firm maintains a strong partnership ecosystem with active social media engagement and a comprehensive attorney directory. Growth indicators include a broad office footprint and diverse practice groups. Strategic observations highlight the firm’s focus on outcomes and resilience in a rapidly changing legal landscape.

Security posture

GrayRobinson demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, indicating awareness of privacy and security best practices. However, the lack of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms suggests room for improvement in transparency and preparedness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the website content. The security score is good but could be enhanced by adding security headers and publishing formal security documentation. Compliance with GDPR is indicated through privacy and cookie policies. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not publicly visible, which is common but recommended for improvement.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and trust.
  2. Implement and verify security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS registration data to enhance domain legitimacy and trust.
  5. Continue maintaining and updating privacy and cookie policies to ensure ongoing GDPR compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GrayRobinson
Description
GrayRobinson is a multidimensional team of professionals providing integrated legal, lobbying, and regulatory services to leading and emerging businesses, state and local governments, industry stakeholders, and entrepreneurs nationwide. They deliver results at local, state, and federal levels.
Key services
Legal services, Lobbying, Regulatory services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Foundation CSS framework, HTML5 video, Google Fonts
Frameworks
Foundation
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via gtag.js)
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia
  2. Strong professional branding and consistent design
  3. Comprehensive legal service offerings with detailed attorney profiles
  4. Social media presence on major platforms
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious content
  6. No exposed sensitive data or security misconfigurations detected
  7. WHOIS data missing which reduces trust score
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and responsive design framework (Foundation) with integration of Google Fonts and Google Tag Manager for analytics. Multimedia content such as HTML5 video enhances user engagement. The site is mobile optimized and accessible with clear navigation and structured content. Performance is moderate, likely due to video content and multiple scripts, but overall user experience is smooth. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected. Technical risks are minimal, but adding security headers and formalizing security documentation would reduce potential attack surface and improve compliance posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gray-robinson.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gray-robinson.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.