Skip to main content

Security report for gratitudeservices.com

Other · N/a

Partial score · DNS & email only

75/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website gratitudeservices.com is a newly registered domain with minimal content primarily consisting of embedded advertisements served via Google AdSense and related Google ad services. The site lacks substantive business information, contact details, or user engagement features, indicating it may be a placeholder or parked domain rather than an active business site. The domain was registered recently through DropCatch.com, a known drop-catching registrar, which suggests speculative registration rather than an established company presence. Technically, the site uses modern HTML5 and CSS3 standards with JavaScript for ad delivery. It is served over HTTPS, but lacks advanced security configurations such as DNSSEC and security headers, which lowers its security posture. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, and SEO features are minimal. There is no evidence of a content management system or advanced frameworks. From a security perspective, the site has a basic SSL configuration but no visible security policies, incident response contacts, or certifications. The absence of cookie consent mechanisms and limited privacy policy details indicate poor privacy compliance. No forms or data collection points are present, reducing immediate data protection concerns but also limiting user interaction. Overall, the site scores low on business credibility and content quality, with moderate technical implementation and security posture. The domain's recent registration and lack of business identity raise concerns about legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, implementing privacy and cookie policies, adding clear business and contact information, and improving content quality to build trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gratitudeservices.com

This scan found 13 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
77
After the cap
75

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The domain appears to be a speculative or parked domain with no clear business operations or market positioning. There is no identifiable company name, legal entity, or sector focus. The lack of business description, services, or contact information suggests no active commercial activity. The site relies on advertising revenue through Google AdSense, indicating a possible revenue stream from ad impressions rather than direct service offerings. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident. The target audience and business model remain undefined due to minimal content.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled but lacks DNSSEC and critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options. No incident response or security policy information is provided. The absence of cookie consent and privacy compliance mechanisms is a compliance gap. No vulnerabilities such as exposed credentials or forms with insecure inputs were detected, but the overall security maturity is low. The domain's recent registration and lack of transparency further reduce trust.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations such as GDPR.
  4. Publish clear business contact information and security policies to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Enhance website content quality and mobile optimization to improve user experience and credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google AdSense, Google Ad Services
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense, Google Ad Services
Tracking pixels
Google Ad Services cookie.js
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is minimal and mostly placeholder with embedded ads.
  2. No visible business description or contact information.
  3. No forms or user input fields detected.
  4. No social media or external business-related links found.
  5. Privacy policy page exists but is basic and no cookie consent mechanism present.
  6. Website uses HTTPS but lacks DNSSEC and security headers.
  7. Advertising scripts from Google AdSense and related services are present.
  8. No evidence of security policies, incident response, or certifications.
  9. Domain is very new and registered via a drop-catching registrar.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using standard HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript primarily for ad delivery. It uses Google AdSense and Google ad services scripts for monetization. The site does not appear to use a CMS or modern web frameworks. Hosting is via DropCatch.com, a domain drop-catching service, indicating a possible speculative domain status. Performance is moderate with no major errors detected, but mobile optimization and accessibility are basic. SEO features are minimal with only basic meta tags and no structured data or Open Graph tags present.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gratitudeservices.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gratitudeservices.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.