Skip to main content

Security report for grasslandagro.com

TIMAC AGRO INTERNATIONAL · Manufacturing · France

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

TIMAC AGRO INTERNATIONAL is a well-established company specializing in soil, plant, and animal nutrition products, serving agricultural professionals globally. Founded in 1959 and headquartered in Saint-Malo, France, it operates as a subsidiary of Groupe Roullier. The company positions itself as a leader in sustainable agriculture solutions, offering fertilization, biostimulation, and animal production nutrition services. The website reflects a professional B2B business model targeting agribusinesses and farmers. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with Elementor, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries such as GSAP and jQuery. It integrates analytics tools including Matomo, Google Analytics (GA4), and Hotjar, with a robust cookie consent mechanism via Tarteaucitron, indicating good privacy compliance. The site is mobile-optimized and demonstrates good SEO practices, although accessibility features are basic. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent management, but lacks visible advanced security headers and does not publish a dedicated security policy or incident response contacts. The WHOIS data is missing, which reduces transparency about domain registration and ownership, though the website content and external references support legitimacy. Overall, the website is professional, secure, and privacy-conscious, but could improve transparency and security posture by publishing security policies and enhancing domain registration visibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching grasslandagro.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
35
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention grasslandagro.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for grasslandagro.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

TIMAC AGRO INTERNATIONAL holds a strong market position in the agricultural manufacturing sector, focusing on soil and animal nutrition. Its competitive advantage lies in its long history, association with Groupe Roullier, and comprehensive product offerings. The business model is B2B, targeting agricultural professionals and enterprises. Revenue streams likely include product sales and consulting services. The company maintains a broad partnership ecosystem, including regional subsidiaries and related domains. Growth indicators include multilingual regional sites and active recruitment. Strategic observations suggest a focus on sustainable agriculture and innovation in biostimulation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with enforced HTTPS and cookie consent compliance. However, the absence of published security policies, incident response contacts, and security.txt files indicates gaps in transparency and readiness. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Compliance with GDPR is evident through privacy and cookie policies. The use of multiple analytics and tracking tools is managed with user consent. Recommendations include implementing security headers, publishing a security policy, and establishing clear incident response channels to enhance security culture and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive security policy page detailing security practices and compliance.
  2. Implement and expose a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file for responsible reporting.
  3. Enhance HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Provide explicit incident response contact information (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email addresses).
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize security risks and ensure privacy compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
TIMAC AGRO INTERNATIONAL
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
TIMAC AGRO INTERNATIONAL
Description
TIMAC AGRO, leader in soil nutrition, fertilization, biostimulation and animal production. Founded in 1959 in Saint-Malo, in France.
Key services
Soil nutrition, Fertilization, Biostimulation, Animal production nutrition
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, jQuery, GSAP, Matomo Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Tarteaucitron (cookie consent)
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo, Google Analytics (GA4), Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo, Google Analytics (GA4), Hotjar
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is professional and relevant to agricultural industry.
  3. Strong presence of privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  4. No visible security headers in provided data; SSL is enabled.
  5. WHOIS data is missing, reducing domain transparency.
  6. Multiple external domains linked, mostly regional subdomains and partner sites.
  7. Tracking and analytics scripts are present but consent is managed.
  8. No forms for user data collection visible on the signup page; registration disabled.
  9. Contact information is clearly provided and consistent with business identity.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder, supported by JavaScript libraries like jQuery and GSAP for animations and interactions. Analytics are handled via Matomo, Google Analytics (GA4), and Hotjar, integrated with a cookie consent management system (Tarteaucitron). The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly with proper meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in accessibility and security headers. Hosting provider details are not explicit. The technical stack supports a professional and scalable digital presence but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with grasslandagro.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review grasslandagro.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.