Skip to main content

Security report for granthamfoundation.org

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website granthamfoundation.org is currently inaccessible due to a Cloudflare security error (Error 1014: CNAME Cross-User Banned), indicating a DNS misconfiguration involving CNAME records across Cloudflare accounts. This results in the site content being blocked and replaced by a Cloudflare error page. Consequently, no business content, contact information, or policies are available for review. The domain is registered since 2005 with a reputable registrar and uses Cloudflare DNS services without DNSSEC enabled. The technical infrastructure relies on Cloudflare's platform, but the misconfiguration severely impacts accessibility and user experience. Security posture is limited due to lack of accessible content, but the presence of Cloudflare indicates some baseline security measures. Privacy compliance and business credibility cannot be verified due to missing content. Overall, the site is currently non-functional for end users and requires DNS configuration correction to restore service.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching granthamfoundation.org

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
35
Email security
90
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

No business intelligence data could be extracted from the website due to the blocked content. The domain age suggests a mature entity, but no information on market positioning, business model, or services is available. No contact or social media links were found. The site appears to be a non-profit or foundation based on the domain name, but this cannot be confirmed. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identifiable from the current data.

Security posture

The security posture is limited by the lack of accessible content. The domain uses Cloudflare as a hosting and security provider, which generally provides strong DDoS protection and WAF capabilities. However, the DNS misconfiguration causing the CNAME cross-user ban error is a critical issue that prevents site availability. No security headers or SSL configuration details are visible. No privacy or incident response policies are published. The site should address DNS setup issues and implement standard security headers and policies to improve security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Resolve the Cloudflare CNAME cross-user ban by correcting DNS CNAME records to comply with Cloudflare policies.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and integrity.
  3. Publish privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  4. Add clear contact information and incident response channels to support security and user inquiries.
  5. Implement security headers (e.g., Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options) and ensure HTTPS is enforced site-wide.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Cloudflare detected. Cloudflare error 1014 CNAME Cross-User Banned page detected indicating DNS misconfiguration and content is blocked by Cloudflare WAF. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
Cloudflare
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
20/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Cloudflare Performance Radar
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cloudflare Performance Radar
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is inaccessible due to Cloudflare error 1014 indicating CNAME cross-user ban.
  2. No business or contact information is available on the page.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No forms or data collection fields present except for a feedback mechanism on the error page.
  5. External links point only to Cloudflare domains and documentation.
  6. No social media links, emails, phone numbers, or addresses found.
  7. Website is hosted behind Cloudflare with DNSSEC not enabled.
  8. WHOIS data shows domain is registered since 2005 with expiry in 2026.
  9. Technical and security posture cannot be fully assessed due to blocked content.
  10. Content safety is rated safe as no adult or questionable content is present.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted behind Cloudflare with name servers asa.ns.cloudflare.com and roan.ns.cloudflare.com. DNSSEC is not enabled. The site returns a Cloudflare error 1014 page indicating a CNAME cross-user ban, a DNS misconfiguration issue. The HTML content is minimal and serves only the error message with no business content. The site uses Cloudflare's performance radar script for analytics and a feedback mechanism for error page usability. No CMS or other frameworks are detected. The site lacks SEO metadata, accessibility features, or mobile optimization due to the error page nature. Performance is moderate as the error page loads quickly but does not serve intended content. The domain is registered with Register.com since 2005 and expires in 2026.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with granthamfoundation.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review granthamfoundation.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.