Skip to main content

Security report for grannyfishhd.com

Danesco Trading Ltd. · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Granny Fish HD is an adult video content aggregation website established in 2017, operated under the domain grannyfishhd.com registered to Danesco Trading Ltd. The site offers a broad range of adult video categories, primarily focusing on mature and niche adult content. It functions as an affiliate platform linking to external video hosting sites rather than hosting content directly. The technical infrastructure includes use of jQuery libraries and Cloudflare DNS services, but lacks advanced security features such as DNSSEC and security headers. The website design is basic with moderate mobile optimization and limited SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is minimal with no visible security policies or incident response mechanisms. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, and no contact information or social media presence is provided, reducing business credibility and compliance. Overall, the site serves a niche adult entertainment market with basic technical and security implementations.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching grannyfishhd.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
40
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates as a small-scale adult content aggregator targeting adult audiences interested in mature and fetish categories. Its revenue model likely relies on affiliate marketing and advertising partnerships with external adult video providers. The extensive categorization and multilingual support indicate an attempt to capture a broad international audience. However, the lack of transparency in contact information and absence of privacy and security policies may limit trust and regulatory compliance. The company appears to maintain a moderate market position within the adult niche aggregator segment, with potential growth constrained by minimal compliance and security practices.

Security posture

The website exhibits a low to moderate security maturity level. While HTTPS is presumably enabled (not explicitly confirmed), no DNSSEC is configured, and no security headers are present in the HTML content. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure or incident response policies. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps, particularly with GDPR and other data protection regulations. The site does not expose sensitive data visibly but lacks proactive security best practices. Overall, the security posture is weak and could expose the business to regulatory and reputational risks.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  4. Provide clear contact information including support and incident response channels.
  5. Conduct a security audit to identify and remediate potential vulnerabilities and improve overall security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Danesco Trading Ltd.
Description
Adult video content aggregation website offering a wide range of adult video categories and collections, primarily focused on mature and niche adult content.
Key services
Video search, Categorized adult video collections, Affiliate linking to partner adult video sites
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.12.4, jQuery UI 1.12.1, Cloudflare DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult content aggregator with extensive categories and affiliate links.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the page.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or social media links found.
  4. Uses Cloudflare DNS but no DNSSEC enabled.
  5. No visible security headers or advanced security practices.
  6. Content is explicit adult material with no age verification.
  7. Website design and navigation are basic but functional.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in the provided HTML.
  9. WHOIS data is consistent and domain is active with expiry in 2026.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses legacy jQuery versions (1.12.4 and 1.12.1) which may have known vulnerabilities; upgrading to modern libraries is recommended. The site relies on Cloudflare DNS but does not utilize DNSSEC, reducing DNS security. The HTML structure is basic with deferred loading of scripts, which may aid performance but lacks modern frontend frameworks or CMS detection. Mobile optimization is basic, and SEO features are minimal with no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data present. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal user tracking. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but outdated and lacking modern security and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with grannyfishhd.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review grannyfishhd.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.