Skip to main content

Security report for grannyfish.com

Danesco Trading Ltd. · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Granny Fish is an adult video search and aggregation website operated by Danesco Trading Ltd., established in 2013. The platform offers a wide range of adult video categories and links users to external video hosting sites. The site does not host content directly but serves as a referral and search tool for adult entertainment. The technical infrastructure relies on older jQuery libraries and Cloudflare DNS services, with no advanced CMS or frameworks detected. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, and SEO practices are minimal. Security posture is moderate with domain protections in place but lacks DNSSEC and security headers. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, indicating non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No contact or incident response information is provided, limiting user trust and transparency. Overall, the site serves a niche adult entertainment audience with basic technical and security implementations.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching grannyfish.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
40
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the adult entertainment aggregation sector, targeting adults-only users seeking explicit video content. The model is based on content aggregation and referral, without direct hosting or production. The company has maintained domain registration since 2013, indicating operational stability. However, the lack of privacy policies, contact information, and security best practices may hinder trust and compliance with evolving regulations. The site’s extensive category listing and multilingual support suggest an attempt to capture a broad international audience. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries. Revenue likely derives from affiliate referrals or advertising, though no ad networks were detected in the provided content.

Security posture

The security maturity level is basic to moderate. The domain is protected against unauthorized deletion and transfer, but DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended security enhancement. The website lacks common security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, increasing risk of certain web attacks. No HTTPS configuration details were provided, but it is assumed HTTPS is in use given modern web standards. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected, but the use of outdated jQuery versions could pose risks if not patched. Absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps, particularly with GDPR. Incident response readiness is not evident due to lack of security contact information. Overall, the site requires improvements in security headers, DNS security, and privacy compliance to reduce risk.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Develop and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  4. Add clear contact information including security and abuse contacts to improve incident response capabilities and user trust.
  5. Update JavaScript libraries to current versions to mitigate vulnerabilities and improve performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Danesco Trading Ltd.
Description
Granny Fish is an adult video search and aggregation website offering a large collection of adult video categories and links to external adult video sources. The site does not host videos but indexes and links to them.
Key services
Adult video search, Category browsing, Referral to external adult video sites
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.12.4, jQuery UI 1.12.1, Cloudflare DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult video search and aggregation platform.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or social media links provided.
  4. Site uses older versions of jQuery and jQuery UI libraries.
  5. No modern security headers or advanced security practices detected.
  6. Content is explicit adult material with many adult categories listed.
  7. Domain is registered to a company with no privacy protection and is stable.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; content fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses legacy jQuery 1.12.4 and jQuery UI 1.12.1 libraries loaded from Google CDN, which are outdated and may have security vulnerabilities. The site relies on Cloudflare for DNS but does not have DNSSEC enabled. The HTML structure is basic with minimal meta tags and no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data present. The site includes a search form using POST method but lacks advanced input validation or security features. Mobile optimization is basic with viewport meta tag present but no responsive frameworks detected. Accessibility features are minimal, and SEO optimization is basic with limited meta descriptions or structured data. Hosting provider details are not explicit beyond Cloudflare DNS. Performance is moderate based on resource loading from multiple grannyfish subdomains. Overall, the technical stack is functional but outdated and lacking modern web standards and security best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with grannyfish.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review grannyfish.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.