Skip to main content

Security report for grandpeat.com

Baltvia · Other · Lithuania

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Baltvia is a Lithuanian company specializing in premium-quality peat moss and growing media products under the brand “GrandPeat,” targeting professional growers in the horticulture sector. Their product offerings include propagation substrates, potting soils, tree nursery substrates, and berry cultivation media, tailored to specific crop and climate needs. The website is built on WordPress using Elementor and Contact Form 7, providing a professional and content-rich user experience with clear contact information and product details. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacking security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, and social media links lack full URLs. Overall, the site is functional and informative but requires improvements in compliance, security transparency, and domain registration verification.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching grandpeat.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Baltvia operates in a niche market supplying specialized horticulture substrates primarily in the Baltic region. Their competitive advantage lies in high-quality peat resources and expert consultation services. The business model is B2B, focusing on professional growers needing tailored growing media. The company maintains a consistent brand presence and targets a specialized audience. The partnership with grandpeat.com suggests a focused product line strategy. Growth potential depends on expanding market reach and enhancing digital trust through compliance and security improvements.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, which is a fundamental security measure. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. No evidence of vulnerability disclosure or incident response policies reduces transparency and preparedness. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential GDPR non-compliance risks. Contact forms are present but require verification for secure handling of user data. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but needs enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to improve web security posture.
  3. Publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies to increase transparency.
  4. Verify and secure contact forms against injection and spam attacks.
  5. Investigate and resolve domain WHOIS registration issues to improve trustworthiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Baltvia
Description
Baltvia offers a new product line “GrandPeat” dedicated to premium-quality peat moss and growing media for professional growers. They provide tailored growing media for different crops and climate cultivation, leveraging first-rate resources, modern production sites, and expert advice.
Key services
Propagation substrates, Potting soils, Tree nursery substrates, Berries cultivation substrates, Expert consultation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, jQuery, FontAwesome, Contact Form 7
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content about horticulture products.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided including company emails and phone numbers.
  4. No explicit security or incident response policies are published.
  5. No visible analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  6. WHOIS data is missing, indicating possible domain registration issues.
  7. Site uses WordPress with Elementor and Contact Form 7 plugins.
  8. No security headers detected in the HTML content.
  9. Site uses HTTPS with valid SSL.
  10. Social media links present but URLs are incomplete (no href URLs).
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern CMS (WordPress) with Elementor page builder and Contact Form 7 plugin, indicating a standard and maintainable infrastructure. The site loads moderate resources including jQuery and FontAwesome icons. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is basic with proper meta tags but lacks advanced optimization. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, suggesting minimal user tracking. Hosting provider details are not evident from the content. Technical risks include outdated plugins or missing security headers, which should be addressed to reduce attack surface.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with grandpeat.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review grandpeat.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.