Skip to main content

Security report for granden.sk

GRANDEN · Other · Slovakia

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GRANDEN is a Slovak insurance company specializing in non-life insurance products tailored for both corporate clients and private individuals. The company offers customized insurance programs focusing on asset protection, real estate, and various specific risks. The website reflects a professional presence with clear navigation and a focus on the Slovak market. The business model centers on providing tailored insurance solutions, positioning GRANDEN as a specialist in its niche within Slovakia. Technically, the website employs modern analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Facebook Pixel, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. The site is mobile-optimized and uses HTTPS, ensuring secure communication. However, no CMS or hosting provider details were explicitly identified. The technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and SEO optimizations. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and reCAPTCHA for bot protection and has implemented a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism. However, there is no visible security policy, incident response information, or security.txt file. Security headers appear to be missing, which could be improved to enhance protection. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Overall, GRANDEN's website presents a trustworthy and professional front for its insurance services, with good privacy compliance through Cookiebot. The absence of explicit privacy and terms of service pages, as well as contact details in the analyzed content, suggests areas for improvement to boost transparency and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching granden.sk

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention granden.sk, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for granden.sk right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GRANDEN operates in the insurance sector, focusing on non-life insurance products for businesses and private clients in Slovakia. The company leverages a business model based on customized insurance programs addressing specific risk areas such as property and business operations. Market positioning is that of a specialist provider with a clear target audience. The website content and structure indicate a small-sized company with consistent branding and a professional approach. The use of third-party analytics and marketing tools suggests an active digital marketing strategy. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified. The lack of explicit contact information and legal disclosures in the provided content limits deeper business intelligence insights.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enforced and use of Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate bot traffic. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, indicating compliance with GDPR cookie requirements. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces the overall security hardening. No incident response or security policy information is published, which could hinder effective communication during security events. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the analyzed content. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for a small insurance provider but could be enhanced with additional security controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the website footer.
  2. Implement and display a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency.
  3. Add security headers (e.g., Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, Strict-Transport-Security) to enhance protection.
  4. Improve accessibility compliance to meet WCAG standards for better user experience.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerabilities or privacy issues.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GRANDEN
Description
Firemným klientom i súkromným osobám ponúkame poistné programy na mieru. Zameriavame sa na ochranu majetku, nehnuteľností a poistenie rôznych špecifických rizík.
Key services
Poistenie pre firmy, Privátne poistenie, Poistné programy na mieru, Ochrana majetku, Poistenie nehnuteľností, Poistenie špecifických rizík
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Facebook Pixel, Cookiebot, Google reCAPTCHA, Bootstrap (implied by navbar classes), WebFont Loader
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for bot protection
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Ads, Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and mobile responsive.
  2. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot with detailed cookie categories.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided HTML snippet.
  5. Use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response information available.
  8. Content is in Slovak language targeting Slovak businesses and private clients.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Facebook Pixel, and Cookiebot for cookie management. The presence of Bootstrap classes suggests use of this framework for responsive design. The site is mobile-optimized and loads asynchronously many scripts to improve performance. However, no CMS or hosting provider information was detected. SEO optimization is basic with meta tags and Open Graph tags present but no JSON-LD structured data found. Accessibility features are minimal. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed and accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with granden.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review granden.sk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.