Skip to main content

Security report for grandem.lv

Grandem Group · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Grandem Group is a creative and dynamically progressing agency based in Latvia specializing in graphic design and web solutions. They offer a broad range of services including website development, graphic design, SEO optimization, brand style development, banner creation, video filming and editing, and logo design. The company targets both corporate and private clients, emphasizing personalized approaches, precision, and responsibility, positioning themselves as a trusted partner in their industry. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern libraries and frameworks such as Bootstrap and jQuery, hosted behind Cloudflare DNS services, ensuring good performance and mobile optimization. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and Google Tag Manager with consent defaults denying ad and analytics storage, but lacks explicit security headers and incident response policies. Overall, the website is professional, GDPR compliant with privacy and cookie policies, and demonstrates moderate trustworthiness with clear contact information and social media presence.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of grandem.lv. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching grandem.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
55
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
10
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Grandem operates as a small-sized service agency in the graphic design and web development sector within Latvia. Their business model focuses on providing tailored digital and branding solutions to a diverse client base. The company leverages a WordPress-based digital platform enhanced with popular front-end frameworks and content delivery optimizations. Their market position is that of a recognized local agency with a portfolio of projects showcased on their site. The presence of structured data and Google site verification indicates a focus on SEO and digital marketing. While no formal certifications or incident response mechanisms are disclosed, the company maintains active social media channels and transparent contact details, supporting client engagement and trust-building.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS is enforced, and no sensitive data is exposed in the HTML content. The use of Google Tag Manager is configured with consent defaults that restrict ad and analytics storage, aligning with privacy best practices. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection reduces the overall security robustness. No known vulnerabilities or malicious indicators were detected in the site content or scripts. The lack of explicit security or incident response policies suggests room for improvement in organizational security maturity and compliance readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Develop and publish a dedicated security policy and incident response plan accessible to users and partners.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance privacy compliance by detailing data retention policies and user rights in privacy documentation.
  5. Increase transparency by adding terms of service and vulnerability disclosure information.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Grandem Group
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Grandem Group
Description
Mēs esam kreatīva un dinamiski progresējoša kompānija, kas piedāvā plašu pakalpojumu klāstu. Individuāla pieeja katram klientam, precizitāte un atbildības sajūta ir galvenie kritēriji, kas padara mūs par labāko partneri grafiskā dizaina un web risinājuma sfērā, kā korporatīvajiem, tā arī privātajiem klientiem.
Key services
Mājaslapas izstrāde, Grafiskais dizains, SEO optimizācija, Zīmola stila izstrāde, Baneru izstrāde, Filmēšana un montāža, Logo izveide
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Bootstrap 4, Font Awesome 4.7, Slick Carousel, Magnific Popup, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager with consent defaults denying ad and analytics storage

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Latvian graphic design and web solutions agency.
  2. Content is professionally presented and localized in Latvian with English alternate.
  3. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and libraries.
  4. Includes structured data for local business with contact info.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies found.
  6. Cookie and privacy policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  7. No terms of service page detected.
  8. Social media presence on Facebook and YouTube.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using modern front-end technologies including Bootstrap 4, jQuery, Font Awesome, Slick Carousel, and Magnific Popup. Hosting is supported by Cloudflare DNS services, likely providing CDN and security benefits. The site is mobile optimized and includes SEO-friendly meta tags and structured data for local business. Performance is moderate with some lazy loading and caching mechanisms (WP Rocket). Accessibility features are basic but present. The technical stack is standard for small to medium-sized agencies, with opportunities to improve security configurations and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 40/100High30 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with grandem.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review grandem.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.