Skip to main content

Security report for grammatix.de

grammatix · Other · Germany

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

39/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Grammatix is a small-scale cultural and artistic photography website based in Germany, focusing on exhibitions, projects, and published books related to regions such as Nepal, Tibet, and Kashmir. The site is built on WordPress and uses common plugins like Yoast SEO and Flash Album Gallery to manage content and galleries. While the website offers good content quality and navigation, it lacks modern security measures such as HTTPS, exposing visitors to potential risks. Privacy compliance is minimal, with no visible privacy or cookie policies, and contact information is limited to a contact form without explicit emails or phone numbers. The domain registration is consistent and transparent, but the absence of domain protection locks is a minor security concern. Overall, the site is functional but requires significant improvements in security and privacy to meet modern standards.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching grammatix.de

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
50
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
39

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Grammatix operates in a niche market of cultural photography and art exhibitions, targeting art enthusiasts and cultural historians. Its business model revolves around showcasing photographic works, organizing exhibitions, and publishing related books. The website's market position is specialized, with a focus on specific geographic and cultural themes. The lack of explicit business contact details and certifications suggests a small, possibly individual or small team operation. The partnership ecosystem is not evident from the website, and there is no indication of revenue streams beyond art sales and book publishing. Growth indicators and strategic partnerships are not visible, limiting insights into business expansion or competitive advantages.

Security posture

The website's security posture is weak due to the absence of HTTPS, lack of security headers, and missing domain protection mechanisms. No incident response or security policies are published, and there is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure or security certifications. The site does not implement modern TLS protocols or cipher suites, and DNSSEC is not enabled. These gaps expose the site and its visitors to risks such as data interception and domain hijacking. The lack of privacy and cookie policies further exacerbates compliance risks, especially under GDPR. Overall, the security maturity is low, requiring urgent remediation to protect both the business and its users.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS and secure all communications.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Add explicit business contact information including verified emails and phone numbers.
  4. Enable domain protection locks and consider DNSSEC to enhance domain security.
  5. Introduce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on an Apache server and built on WordPress 6.8.1, utilizing jQuery and several plugins including Yoast SEO and Flash Album Gallery. The site uses chunked transfer encoding but lacks performance metrics, suggesting potential slow loading times. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, with no advanced features detected. SEO is supported by Yoast, providing good metadata and structured data via JSON-LD. However, the absence of HTTPS and modern TLS protocols is a significant technical deficiency. The hosting provider appears to be IONOS based on DNS and MX records. The site structure is well-organized with clear navigation menus and archived content dating back several years, indicating a mature content base but with technical debt in security and performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with grammatix.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review grammatix.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.