Skip to main content

Security report for gram.gs

Gram Games · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Gram Games is a medium-sized mobile game development company founded in 2012, specializing in engaging social and puzzle games for mobile platforms. The company operates under the parent company Take-Two Interactive, with strong branding and a portfolio of popular games such as 1010!, Merge Dragons!, and Merge Magic!. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, targeting mobile gamers globally. The business model focuses on game development and publishing with community engagement as a key aspect. Technically, the website uses modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery, and Modernizr, hosted on Amazon AWS infrastructure. It incorporates Google Analytics for user tracking and OneTrust for cookie consent management, indicating a mature digital presence. The site is mobile optimized with good SEO and accessibility basics, though some improvements in accessibility could be made. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and has domain registration protections in place. However, no explicit security headers were detected, and there is no published security policy or incident response contact. The cookie consent mechanism is robust and GDPR compliant. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious patterns were found, but enabling DNSSEC and security headers would strengthen the security posture. Overall, the website is trustworthy, professionally maintained, and compliant with privacy regulations. The risk level is low, but strategic improvements in security policies and technical controls are recommended to enhance resilience and trust further.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gram.gs

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
45
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention gram.gs, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
12
Employees
0
Customers
0
Third parties
12
Weak passwords
0%

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for gram.gs.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Gram Games holds a strong position in the mobile gaming market with a focus on casual and social puzzle games. Their competitive advantage lies in popular game titles and backing by a major parent company, Take-Two Interactive. Revenue streams likely include in-app purchases and advertising. The target customer segment is mobile gamers worldwide, with a community-driven approach. The company maintains partnerships with Zynga and Take-Two Interactive, leveraging their infrastructure and legal frameworks. Growth indicators include recent game launches and active social media engagement. The website supports recruitment and community initiatives, reflecting a strategic focus on talent and brand loyalty.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. The site uses HTTPS and enforces domain transfer restrictions, which are positive indicators. The cookie consent implementation is GDPR compliant and blocks tracking scripts until consent is given. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others is a gap. No incident response or security policy is publicly available, limiting transparency. There is no security.txt or vulnerability disclosure program, which could hinder responsible vulnerability reporting. Overall, the security culture appears basic but functional, with room for improvement in formal policies and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program and publish a security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Gram Games
Description
Gram Games is an entertainment company delivering engaging social games for the mobile world to create real bonds through play. They develop and publish popular mobile games such as 1010!, Merge Dragons!, and Merge Magic!.
Key services
Mobile game development, Game publishing, Community engagement
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery, Google Analytics, OneTrust Cookie Consent
Frameworks
Modernizr
Platforms
AWS (DNS via AWS Route53)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled (implied by URL)
  • Cookie consent banner with blocking of Google Analytics until consent
  • Domain status includes clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited, clientDeleteProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Ads Remarketing
Marketing tools
OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich
  2. Clear links to parent company Zynga and Take-Two Interactive
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with OneTrust
  4. No visible security headers detected in provided data
  5. No contact phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly listed on the main page
  6. Social media presence is strong with official accounts linked
  7. No security.txt or explicit vulnerability disclosure found
  8. WHOIS data is consistent and trustworthy
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern and standard technology stack with HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and jQuery. It uses Modernizr for feature detection and is hosted on Amazon AWS infrastructure, indicating reliable hosting. Google Analytics and OneTrust are integrated for analytics and privacy compliance. The site is mobile responsive and SEO optimized with proper meta tags. Performance is moderate, with video content on the landing page that may impact load times. There is no detected CMS, suggesting a custom or static site approach. Technical risks include missing security headers and lack of DNSSEC, which could be addressed to improve security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gram.gs. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gram.gs.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.