Ing. Kateřina Srncová · Other · Czech Republic
Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.
The website www.grafikawebsrnka.cz represents a small business or individual service provider specializing in graphic design and web development services, including corporate logos, business cards, flyers, and websites. However, the site is currently under construction and contains only a placeholder page with minimal content. The business appears to be operated by Ing. Kateřina Srncová, but no further company details or contact information are provided. The market position and business scale cannot be determined from the available data. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using a free under construction plugin, Bootstrap for styling, and Font Awesome for icons. The site shows basic mobile responsiveness and SEO metadata but lacks advanced technical features or performance optimizations. No hosting provider or infrastructure details are discernible. Security measures are minimal, with no security headers detected and no visible HTTPS verification from the data provided. From a security perspective, the absence of WHOIS registration data is a significant concern, suggesting the domain may be unregistered, recently registered, or privacy-protected with no public data. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are present, and no contact or incident response information is available. The site does not use analytics or tracking technologies, which limits data privacy concerns but also reduces business intelligence capabilities. Overall, the security posture is weak, with recommendations to implement HTTPS, security headers, and proper policies. The overall risk assessment is moderate to high due to the lack of transparency, minimal content, and missing registration data. Strategic recommendations include completing the website content, publishing privacy and cookie policies, securing the domain registration, and enhancing security configurations to build trust and comply with regulations.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures
GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
Prevents clickjacking attacks
What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention grafikawebsrnka.cz, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for grafikawebsrnka.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with grafikawebsrnka.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review grafikawebsrnka.cz.