Skip to main content

Security report for graemejenkinson.co.uk

Graeme Jenkinson · Technology · United Kingdom

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

28/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Graeme Jenkinson's website presents a specialized service focused on creating responsive and well-coded HTML email campaigns aimed at improving customer engagement and brand reputation. The site targets businesses and marketers looking for expert email marketing solutions, positioning itself as a niche provider with a strong emphasis on quality email design and coding. The business model is service-oriented, primarily catering to small business clients or individual professionals. Technically, the website uses standard HTML5 and CSS3 with jQuery and Fancybox libraries for interactive elements. The presence of a cookie consent banner from WebsitePolicies.io indicates some attention to privacy compliance, though no formal privacy or terms of service pages are found. The site appears moderately optimized for mobile devices and has a clear, structured layout, but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. From a security perspective, the site lacks visible HTTPS enforcement and security headers, which are critical for protecting user data and establishing trust. No incident response or security policy information is provided, and the use of outdated JavaScript libraries could expose the site to vulnerabilities. The absence of direct contact information such as email or phone numbers limits user trust and engagement potential. Overall, the website is functional and professionally presented but requires significant improvements in security posture, privacy compliance, and contact transparency to enhance trustworthiness and reduce risk. Strategic recommendations include implementing HTTPS, adding comprehensive privacy and security policies, updating technical components, and providing clear contact channels.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  4. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  5. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching graemejenkinson.co.uk

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
25
Average
28

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates as a small, specialized service provider in the technology sector, focusing on email marketing design and coding. Its competitive advantage lies in expertise in responsive HTML email creation, targeting marketers and businesses seeking to improve email campaign effectiveness. Revenue likely derives from project-based services or consulting. The target customer segment includes marketing professionals and companies valuing quality email communication. The website's partnership ecosystem is minimal, with only external links to LinkedIn and industry-related sites. Growth indicators are limited due to the small scale and personal branding nature of the site. Strategic observations suggest potential for expansion through enhanced digital presence and formalized service offerings.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is low, with critical gaps such as missing HTTPS, lack of security headers, and absence of documented security policies. These vulnerabilities increase the risk of data interception, phishing, and reputational damage. Compliance gaps include no visible GDPR-compliant privacy policy despite cookie consent implementation. Incident response readiness is unaddressed, with no security contact channels provided. The security culture appears minimal, reflecting a small-scale operation without dedicated security resources. Business impact of these issues includes potential loss of client trust and exposure to cyber threats. Addressing these gaps is essential for improving overall security posture and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all website traffic.
  2. Develop and publish comprehensive privacy and security policies to enhance compliance and transparency.
  3. Update JavaScript libraries to current versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  4. Add direct contact methods such as a company email address and phone number to improve user trust and communication.
  5. Introduce security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, etc.) and conduct regular security audits.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Graeme Jenkinson
Description
Specializes in creating responsive, well-coded HTML email campaigns designed to improve engagement and brand reputation.
Key services
Responsive HTML email design, Email coding and testing, Email campaign optimization
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, jQuery 1.10.1, Fancybox 2.1.5, WebsitePolicies.io cookie consent
Frameworks
Skel (responsive framework)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
WebsitePolicies.io cookie consent
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website focuses on HTML email marketing services by an individual professional.
  2. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  3. Cookie consent banner present and functional.
  4. Contact limited to LinkedIn profile link; no direct email or phone contact found.
  5. No forms present on the site for direct contact or data collection.
  6. No security policies or incident response information provided.
  7. No SSL/HTTPS status confirmed from provided data; assumed missing or unknown.
  8. Use of older jQuery version (1.10.1) and Fancybox 2.1.5 may pose minor security risks.
  9. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond cookie consent.
  10. No visible trust seals, certifications, or testimonials.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and jQuery 1.10.1, supplemented by Fancybox for image galleries and Skel for responsive design. The use of WebsitePolicies.io for cookie consent indicates some attention to regulatory requirements. However, the technology stack includes outdated libraries that may pose security risks. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization indicators. The site is mobile-optimized with a clear layout but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. There is no detected CMS or hosting provider information. Technical debt is present due to legacy scripts and missing security best practices, suggesting opportunities for modernization and improved resilience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with graemejenkinson.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review graemejenkinson.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.