Skip to main content

Security report for govguamdocs.com

Data Management Resources, LLC · Government · Guam

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GovGuamDocs.com is an informational website serving as a centralized resource for Government of Guam forms across multiple departments and agencies. It provides downloadable PDF forms and links to official government payment portals, targeting residents and businesses interacting with Guam government services. The site is operated by Data Management Resources, LLC, as indicated by the copyright notice. The website's market position is as a primary online resource for Guam government forms, with a straightforward business model focused on information dissemination. Technically, the website is built using basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript without modern frameworks or CMS. The design is dated with fixed-width layouts and minimal mobile optimization. SEO and accessibility features are basic, and performance is moderate. The site uses Google Analytics for tracking but lacks modern privacy and cookie compliance mechanisms. From a security perspective, the site lacks HTTPS, security headers, and privacy policies, which significantly lowers its security posture. The WHOIS data for the domain is missing or unregistered, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy despite the presence of official government-related content. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. Overall, the website is functional for its purpose but requires urgent improvements in security, privacy compliance, and domain registration legitimacy to enhance trust and protect users. Strategic recommendations include implementing HTTPS, adding security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and resolving domain registration inconsistencies.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching govguamdocs.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GovGuamDocs.com occupies a niche as a government forms repository for the Government of Guam, serving a defined audience of residents and businesses needing official documents. Its competitive advantage lies in aggregating forms from multiple departments in one place. The business model is informational with no direct monetization evident. Revenue streams may be indirect or through associated government contracts. The partnership ecosystem includes official Guam government payment portals, enhancing service integration. Growth indicators are limited due to dated technology and lack of modern features. Strategic observations suggest modernization and compliance upgrades are needed to maintain relevance and trust.

Security posture

The website's security maturity is low, with critical gaps such as absence of HTTPS, missing security headers, and no visible privacy or incident response policies. These deficiencies expose users to risks including data interception and lack of transparency on data handling. The missing WHOIS data further undermines trust and raises questions about domain ownership. Compliance with GDPR or other data protection regulations is not evident. Incident response readiness appears absent, with no security contact channels provided. The security culture seems minimal, focusing on basic content delivery without robust protections.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure user connections.
  2. Add essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with data protection regulations.
  4. Resolve domain WHOIS registration issues to establish legitimacy and trust.
  5. Enhance mobile responsiveness and accessibility to improve user experience and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Data Management Resources, LLC
Description
GovGuamDocs.com is a resource website providing access to Government of Guam forms from various departments and agencies.
Key services
Providing downloadable PDF forms for Government of Guam departments, Links to government payment portals, Search functionality for forms
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML, CSS, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of Adobe Reader requirement for PDFs

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (urchin.js)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website serves as a centralized resource for Government of Guam forms.
  2. Content is primarily static HTML with PDF downloads.
  3. No HTTPS detected in links; security posture is weak.
  4. No privacy or cookie policies present.
  5. WHOIS data unavailable, raising legitimacy concerns.
  6. No contact phone numbers found; only one support email.
  7. No social media or modern integrations detected.
  8. Google Analytics used for tracking.
  9. Mobile optimization is poor; site uses fixed width tables and outdated HTML.
  10. No visible security headers or advanced security measures.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a simple technology stack of HTML, CSS, and JavaScript without modern frameworks or CMS. The layout relies on fixed-width tables and outdated HTML practices, resulting in poor mobile optimization and basic accessibility. Performance is moderate but could be improved with modern techniques. SEO is basic with meta tags but lacks structured data or Open Graph tags. The site uses Google Analytics for tracking but does not implement privacy-friendly configurations. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not discernible from the content. Technical debt is evident, and modernization opportunities include adopting responsive design, CMS integration, and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with govguamdocs.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review govguamdocs.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.