Dark web exposure
Add-onLeaked records that mention gov.br, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for gov.br right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
GOV.BR · Government · Brazil
Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and DNS health.
The website www.gov.br is the official Brazilian federal government portal designed to centralize access to public services and government information. It serves a broad audience including citizens, businesses, public entities, and other social segments. The portal offers a comprehensive range of digital services, information dissemination, and citizen engagement tools, positioning itself as a critical digital infrastructure for government-citizen interaction in Brazil. The site is well-branded, professionally designed, and consistently maintained, reflecting its authoritative status. Technically, the site leverages the Plone CMS platform, integrates modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Swiper.js, and employs Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. Hosting is managed by SERPRO, a trusted Brazilian government IT service provider. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices, ensuring broad usability and reach. From a security perspective, the portal enforces HTTPS, includes cookie consent mechanisms, and avoids exposing sensitive data. However, explicit security headers like X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options are not clearly detected and could be improved. No dedicated security policy or incident response contacts are published, and no vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file is found, indicating areas for enhancement in transparency and security maturity. Overall, the portal is highly trustworthy and professionally managed, with strong alignment between domain registration data and official government infrastructure. It poses minimal risk and serves as a reliable digital gateway for Brazilian government services.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently
GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit
Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, Cloudflare, Google Ads
What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy
DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.
MX record points to unregistered domain:
What to do: Remove or fix MX record pointing to unregistered domain
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention gov.br, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for gov.br right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with gov.br. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gov.br.