Skip to main content

Security report for gov-acq.com

Government Acquisitions Inc · Government · United States

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Government Acquisitions Inc (GAI) is a specialized technology solutions provider focused on empowering federal agencies with advanced AI, cybersecurity, infrastructure, analytics, and automation services. Recognized as NVIDIA’s 2025 Public Sector Partner of the Year, GAI leverages over three decades of expertise to deliver comprehensive IT modernization solutions tailored to the public sector. Their offerings include AI-powered platforms, governance and compliance solutions, healthcare AI, and intelligent edge technologies, positioning them as a trusted partner in government digital transformation. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Avada theme, integrating modern technologies such as jQuery, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot analytics, and accessibility tools like UserWay. The site demonstrates good performance, mobile optimization, and SEO practices, though some analytics configurations remain incomplete. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, but could benefit from enhanced security headers and explicit security policy disclosures. Overall, GAI presents a professional and trustworthy digital presence with clear business information, certifications, and active social media engagement. The site is accessible without WAF or blocking mechanisms, enabling full content analysis. Strategic improvements in privacy policy detail, security disclosures, and analytics setup would further enhance compliance and operational maturity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gov-acq.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GAI operates in the government technology sector, targeting federal agencies with AI and IT modernization solutions. Their competitive advantage lies in deep domain expertise, recognized partnerships (e.g., NVIDIA, Intel), and a broad portfolio of AI-driven services including governance, risk, compliance, and healthcare AI. The business model centers on government contracting and technology consulting, supported by certifications like HUB Zone and ISO 9001:2015. The company maintains a strong partnership ecosystem and demonstrates growth through awards and thought leadership content. Their market positioning as a specialized AI and cybersecurity provider for government agencies is clear and credible.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data. Security headers are present but could be enhanced with additional controls such as Content Security Policy and HSTS. No vulnerable libraries or insecure forms were detected. However, the absence of a public security policy or incident response information represents a compliance gap. Data protection practices appear adequate, but explicit GDPR compliance indicators are limited. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not publicly documented, suggesting room for improvement in transparency and preparedness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and compliance.
  2. Implement a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  3. Complete configuration of Google Analytics via MonsterInsights to ensure accurate data collection and privacy compliance.
  4. Enhance HTTP security headers by adding Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Government Acquisitions Inc
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Government Acquisitions Inc
Description
Government Acquisitions, Inc. (GAI) empowers federal agencies to achieve their mission-critical goals by leveraging cutting-edge technologies and collaborative partnerships. With over three decades of expertise in delivering enterprise solutions in cybersecurity, infrastructure, analytics, automation, and artificial intelligence. GAI designs, deploys, and optimizes comprehensive IT solutions that drive business outcomes.
Key services
AI & Data Strategy, Infrastructure, Analytics, Automation, Cybersecurity, Workshops, Healthcare AI Solutions, Governance, Risk, Compliance, Intelligent Data Operations, Talent Management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot Analytics, YouTube iframe API, Tagembed widget, UserWay accessibility widget
Frameworks
Avada WordPress Theme
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data found in HTML
  • Secure forms with proper input types
  • Use of security-related meta tags

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, HubSpot Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
HubSpot Analytics
Marketing tools
HubSpot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and comprehensive content about AI and IT solutions for government.
  2. Strong focus on federal government sector with specialized services and solutions.
  3. Multiple certifications and awards enhance trustworthiness.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and accessibility tools.
  5. Privacy and cookie policies present but could be more comprehensive.
  6. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  7. No signs of blocking or WAF interference.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS with the Avada theme, leveraging jQuery and various third-party integrations such as HubSpot and Tagembed widgets. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness and accessibility features enabled, including the UserWay widget. SEO is well addressed through meta tags, Open Graph, and structured data (JSON-LD). Some technical debt is noted in incomplete analytics setup and reliance on multiple external scripts which may impact load times. Opportunities exist to optimize script loading and enhance security headers to reduce risk and improve performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gov-acq.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gov-acq.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.