Skip to main content

Security report for gors.lv

GORS Limited · Manufacturing · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GORS Limited is a specialized manufacturing company based in Latvia, focused on providing patented electromagnetic induction technologies and equipment for the aluminium industry. With over 20 years of experience and roots dating back to the 1980s, the company offers a range of products including induction mixer modules, stirrers, mixers, vertical pumps, and vortex melting technologies designed to improve furnace efficiency and metal quality. The website reflects a niche B2B industrial focus targeting aluminium producers and foundries. Technically, the website is built with standard HTML5, CSS3, and jQuery, with no detected CMS or advanced frameworks. The site is moderately optimized for mobile and SEO but lacks advanced accessibility features. No analytics or tracking tools are evident, indicating minimal user tracking. The site is accessible with no WAF or blocking mechanisms detected. From a security perspective, the site lacks visible security headers and privacy or cookie policies, which are critical for GDPR compliance and user trust. No forms collecting sensitive data are present, reducing immediate risk, but the absence of HTTPS status and security policies suggests room for improvement. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the website presents a professional industrial business with good content quality and clear contact information but requires enhancements in privacy compliance, security posture, and domain trust verification to improve overall risk profile and user confidence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gors.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GORS Limited operates in a specialized segment of the aluminium manufacturing industry, offering patented electromagnetic induction technologies that retrofit existing furnaces to improve efficiency and metal quality. Their competitive advantage lies in decades of engineering expertise and patented products. The business model is B2B, targeting industrial aluminium producers and foundries. Revenue streams likely come from product sales and retrofitting services. The company maintains a focused product portfolio with no evident diversification. The website lacks visible partnerships or subsidiaries, indicating a lean operation. Growth indicators are not explicit but the long history and patented technologies suggest stable niche market presence.

Security posture

The current security posture is moderate but incomplete. The absence of HTTPS confirmation and security headers reduces protection against common web threats. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting transparency and readiness. The lack of analytics and tracking reduces privacy risks but also limits user behavior insights. Overall, the site would benefit from implementing HTTPS, security headers, privacy policies, and a vulnerability disclosure framework to enhance security maturity and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce secure connections site-wide.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users about data handling.
  3. Deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common attacks.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  5. Include incident response contact information and consider appointing a Data Protection Officer to enhance compliance and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
GORS Limited
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GORS Limited
Description
GORS Limited is a company specializing in electromagnetic inductors and related technologies for aluminium melting and holding furnaces. Founded in 1994, with roots dating back to the 1980s, it offers patented products such as induction mixer modules, stirrers, mixers, vertical pumps, and vortex melting technology aimed at improving aluminium production efficiency and quality.
Key services
Electromagnetic inductors, Induction mixer modules, Stirrers and pumps, Vortex melting technology, Retrofitting existing furnaces
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, jQuery 3.2.1, Ionicons, Google Fonts (Lato)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • No forms with sensitive inputs detected
  • No exposed credentials or sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and content is complete with no blocking detected.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided with company email, phone, and physical address in Latvia.
  4. No social media links or security policies disclosed.
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond jQuery and fonts.
  6. No forms collecting user data found on the site.
  7. Website uses basic but consistent branding and design.
  8. No security headers or HTTPS status provided; security posture is moderate but could be improved.
  9. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust verification.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a simple, clean technical stack with HTML5, CSS3, and jQuery 3.2.1. It loads Google Fonts and Ionicons for styling and icons. No CMS or advanced frameworks are detected, indicating a custom or static site approach. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization indicators. Mobile responsiveness is good, but accessibility features are basic. SEO is basic with meta viewport and charset tags but no Open Graph or structured data found. No analytics or tracking scripts are present, suggesting minimal data collection. The site lacks security headers and HTTPS status is unknown, representing technical risks. Overall, the site is functional but could benefit from modernization and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gors.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gors.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.