Skip to main content

Security report for gopr-podhale.pl

Grupa Regionalna Górskiego Ochotniczego Pogotowia Ratunkowego – Grupa Podhalańska · Government · Poland

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Grupa Podhalańska GOPR is a regional mountain rescue organization in Poland dedicated to providing mountain rescue services, safety information, and community engagement. The website serves as an information hub for tourists, volunteers, and the local community, offering news, projects, and donation options. The organization is supported by multiple partners and sponsors, reflecting a strong community and institutional backing. Technically, the website is built on the Velacms platform with common web technologies like jQuery and Bootstrap, providing a responsive and user-friendly experience. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented, but lacks visible advanced security headers and detailed security policies. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification, but the website content and contact information indicate a legitimate and professional entity. Overall, the site is well-maintained, informative, and trustworthy for its intended audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gopr-podhale.pl

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the government and non-profit sectors, focusing on mountain rescue and safety. Its business model relies on public trust, partnerships, and donations, supported by a network of sponsors and cooperating mountain rescue services across borders. The website reflects a medium-sized entity with a clear target audience of tourists, rescue volunteers, and local residents. The presence of multiple partner logos and donation payment integration indicates a mature partnership ecosystem. The lack of visible analytics tools suggests a conservative approach to user tracking, aligning with privacy compliance. The organization’s market position is stable within its niche, leveraging community trust and official affiliations.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture with HTTPS enforced and a cookie consent mechanism in place, indicating GDPR awareness. However, no security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS were detected, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting transparency in security management. The presence of a named Data Protection Officer with contact details is a positive compliance indicator. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a non-commercial informational site but could be improved with additional security controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance web security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and vulnerability disclosure page to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance SEO and accessibility features to improve user experience and reach.
  5. Consider integrating privacy-respecting analytics to gain insights while maintaining GDPR compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Grupa Regionalna Górskiego Ochotniczego Pogotowia Ratunkowego – Grupa Podhalańska
Registration number
0000156881
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Grupa Regionalna Górskiego Ochotniczego Pogotowia Ratunkowego – Grupa Podhalańska
Description
Grupa Podhalańska GOPR is a regional mountain rescue group operating in Poland, providing mountain rescue services, safety information, and community engagement.
Key services
Mountain rescue operations, Safety and prevention information, Volunteer recruitment and training, Community events and projects
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.5.1, Font Awesome 4.7.0, Velacms CMS, Owl Carousel
Frameworks
Bootstrap (implied by classes like col-md-*)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage (implied by https URL)
  • Cookie consent banner

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. No WHOIS data available, limiting domain trust verification
  3. Clear contact information and data protection officer details provided
  4. Cookie consent banner present and functional
  5. No visible security headers detected in provided data
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in HTML content
  7. Multiple partner and sponsor logos with external links
  8. Donation/payment integration via tpay.com present
  9. No forms detected that collect user data on main page
  10. Content is in Polish language and targeted at mountain rescue community and tourists
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern CMS (Velacms) with standard web technologies such as jQuery and Bootstrap, ensuring responsive design and compatibility. The use of Owl Carousel and Font Awesome enhances UI/UX. Performance is moderate with no evident heavy scripts or trackers. The site includes a cookie consent banner, indicating privacy compliance efforts. However, no advanced analytics or marketing tools were detected, which may limit business intelligence capabilities. The absence of security headers and WHOIS data are technical risks that should be addressed. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for an informational non-profit site but could benefit from security and SEO enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gopr-podhale.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gopr-podhale.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.