Skip to main content

Security report for goop.house

GOOP HOUSE · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GOOP HOUSE is a small, niche online community of creators focused on experimental music and art. They organize creative events such as GOOP WEEK, where participants create music inspired by visual art, with proceeds benefiting charity. The website serves as a hub linking to social platforms like Discord, SoundCloud, Twitch, and Twitter to engage their community. The business model centers on community-driven creative collaboration and merchandise sales. Technically, the website is built with basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, hosted behind Cloudflare DNS and CDN services. The site shows moderate performance and basic mobile optimization but lacks advanced frameworks or CMS. SEO and accessibility features are minimal but functional. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating a privacy-conscious approach. From a security perspective, the site lacks important security headers and DNSSEC is not enabled. The domain uses privacy protection, which is reasonable for this type of small community. No privacy or cookie policies are present, representing compliance gaps. No contact emails or phone numbers are provided, limiting direct communication and incident response capabilities. Overall, the site is safe for general audiences, with no adult or explicit content detected. The trustworthiness is moderate given the lack of formal business information and security best practices. Strategic improvements in security headers, privacy compliance, and contact transparency would enhance trust and resilience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching goop.house

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GOOP HOUSE operates as a creative community platform targeting artists and musicians interested in experimental genres. Its competitive advantage lies in its unique event GOOP WEEK, which fosters creativity and charity simultaneously. Revenue streams include merchandise sales and streaming proceeds. The partnership ecosystem includes social platforms like Discord and Twitch for community engagement. Growth indicators include an active member count of over 4600 and recurring events. The business model is community-centric rather than commercial, focusing on artistic collaboration and charitable impact.

Security posture

The current security maturity is low to moderate. Key vulnerabilities include absence of security headers, lack of DNSSEC, and missing privacy and cookie policies. The use of privacy protection for WHOIS is appropriate but limits transparency. Incident response readiness is minimal due to no contact or abuse channels. Compliance with GDPR or other regulations is not evident. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The security culture appears informal, consistent with a small creative community. Enhancements in security controls and compliance documentation are recommended.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS configuration.
  2. Add and maintain comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance.
  3. Configure essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security and abuse reporting channels.
  5. Enable DNSSEC to improve domain name system security.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GOOP HOUSE
Description
GOOP HOUSE is an online worldwide community of creators specializing in revolutionizing genres and doing the unthinkable. They organize GOOP WEEK, a creative event where participants make songs based on visual art, with proceeds going to charity.
Key services
Community engagement, GOOP WEEK creative events, Music streaming, Merchandise sales
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a niche artistic community platform focused on music and creative events.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers provided, limiting direct communication.
  4. External links to social and streaming platforms support community engagement.
  5. No security headers detected; DNSSEC not enabled.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected, indicating minimal user tracking.
  7. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
  8. Domain uses privacy protection, typical for small community sites.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a simple technology stack with HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, without any detected CMS or advanced frameworks. Hosting is via Cloudflare DNS and CDN, which provides some performance and security benefits. The site loads moderately fast but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. No analytics or tracking tools were detected, indicating minimal data collection. The site is mobile responsive at a basic level. Technical debt appears low but modernization opportunities exist, especially in security and compliance implementations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with goop.house. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review goop.house.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.