Skip to main content

Security report for google.com.br

Google LLC · Technology · United States

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Google LLC is a global technology leader primarily known for its search engine and extensive portfolio of internet-related services including advertising, cloud computing, software, and hardware products. As a subsidiary of Alphabet Inc., Google holds a dominant market position with a broad target audience ranging from individual consumers to enterprises worldwide. The website reflects this stature with a professional design, excellent content quality, and comprehensive privacy and cookie policies that comply with GDPR standards. Technically, the site leverages modern web technologies, including advanced JavaScript, SVG graphics, and Google Fonts, hosted on Google Cloud Platform ensuring fast performance and excellent mobile optimization. Security is robust with HTTPS enforced, strong security headers, and no detected vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. The site also integrates Google’s own analytics and marketing tools, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. From a security perspective, Google demonstrates a high level of maturity with best practices in place, including secure forms, content security policies, and privacy compliance. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure pages were found, but the overall security posture is strong. The domain is well-established, consistent with the company’s history, and the WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is justified for a company of this scale. Overall, Google’s website is highly professional, secure, and compliant, serving a vast global audience with trust and transparency. Strategic recommendations include maintaining continuous security audits, enhancing incident response visibility, and further transparency in security and privacy communications.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching google.com.br

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
50
Email security
83
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Google operates as a technology giant with a diversified business model centered on advertising revenue, cloud services, and consumer products. Its competitive advantage lies in its dominant search engine, extensive data analytics capabilities, and ecosystem of products and services. Revenue streams include advertising via Google Ads, cloud platform services, hardware sales, and app marketplaces. The target customer segments range from individual users to large enterprises. Growth indicators include continuous innovation in AI, cloud computing, and hardware. The partnership ecosystem includes subsidiaries like YouTube and Android, enhancing market reach and technological synergy. Operationally, Google maintains a strong global presence with a focus on privacy, security, and user experience.

Security posture

Google’s security posture is exemplary, with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities. The site employs best practices such as Content Security Policy and secure cookie handling. Although no explicit incident response or security policy pages were found, the company’s global reputation and compliance with GDPR indicate mature security governance. No exposed sensitive data or outdated libraries were detected. The absence of a public WHOIS record is consistent with privacy protection for a major corporation. Overall, Google demonstrates a strong security culture and readiness, though increased transparency on incident response could enhance trust further.

Recommendations

  1. Maintain and regularly update security headers and HTTPS configurations to stay ahead of emerging threats.
  2. Publish a dedicated incident response and vulnerability disclosure page to improve transparency and community engagement.
  3. Enhance privacy communications by providing clearer data retention and processing details on the website.
  4. Continue to invest in mobile optimization and accessibility to maintain excellent user experience across devices.
  5. Expand trust signals by showcasing certifications and compliance badges prominently on the site.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Google LLC
Description
Google LLC operates a global search engine and provides a wide range of internet-related services and products including advertising technologies, cloud computing, software, and hardware.
Key services
Search engine, Advertising, Cloud services, Software products, Hardware products
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, HTML5, CSS3, Google Fonts, SVG
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
95/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure cookies
  • Content Security Policy
  • No exposed sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Marketing tools
Google Ads, Google Marketing Platform
Transparency
excellent

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible and functional
  2. No security blocking or WAF challenges detected
  3. Content is professional, well structured, and localized in German
  4. Strong privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage
  6. Robust security headers and HTTPS enforced
  7. Extensive use of Google proprietary technologies and analytics
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web standards including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, with extensive use of SVG for graphics and Google Fonts for typography. It is hosted on Google Cloud Platform, ensuring high availability and fast load times. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with SEO best practices implemented via meta tags and structured data. No CMS is detected, indicating a custom-built platform. Performance is fast with minimal blocking resources. The technical infrastructure reflects a mature, scalable, and secure environment suitable for a global enterprise.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 78/100Low24 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with google.com.br. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review google.com.br.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.