Skip to main content

Security report for google.bj

Google · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Google LLC operates as a global leader in internet-related services and products, including its flagship search engine, advertising platforms, cloud computing, and software solutions. The company maintains a dominant market position with a broad target audience encompassing general internet users worldwide. Its business model primarily revolves around providing free services monetized through advertising. The website reflects Google's enterprise scale with excellent content quality, professional design, and consistent branding. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies such as JavaScript, SVG, and Google Fonts, optimized for fast performance and excellent mobile responsiveness. Security is robust, with HTTPS enforced, comprehensive security headers, and privacy compliance mechanisms including GDPR-aligned privacy and cookie policies with consent management. The absence of exposed vulnerabilities and the use of secure forms further strengthen its security posture. Overall, Google’s website demonstrates a mature digital infrastructure and a strong security culture. The domain’s WHOIS data is privacy-protected, which is typical for large enterprises, and does not detract from its legitimacy. The site’s extensive use of Google-owned domains and services further confirms its authenticity. Strategic recommendations include maintaining ongoing security audits, enhancing incident response transparency, and continuing to uphold privacy standards to sustain trust and compliance.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of google.bj. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching google.bj

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
45
Email security
83
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Google holds a market-leading position in the technology sector, particularly in search engine and online advertising markets. Its competitive advantage lies in its vast ecosystem of services and data-driven advertising model. Revenue streams are primarily from advertising, supplemented by cloud services and hardware sales. The company targets a global audience, including consumers, businesses, and developers. Growth indicators include continuous innovation and expansion into cloud computing and AI. Partnerships and related domains such as the Google Store and support services form a comprehensive ecosystem supporting its operations.

Security posture

Google’s security maturity is high, with enforced HTTPS, strong security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities in the website content. Privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms indicate compliance with GDPR and other regulations. However, no explicit incident response or security policy pages were found on the homepage, which is common for large enterprises that manage these through dedicated portals. The absence of direct contact channels for security incidents suggests reliance on established corporate channels. Overall, the security posture is robust with minimal risk exposure from the public website.

Recommendations

  1. Maintain regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to detect emerging threats.
  2. Enhance visibility and accessibility of incident response contacts and security policies for transparency.
  3. Continue to update and monitor third-party libraries and scripts to prevent vulnerabilities.
  4. Strengthen user trust by providing clear, accessible information on data protection officers and compliance measures.
  5. Invest in long-term security strategy focusing on emerging technologies and regulatory changes.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Google
Description
Google is a global technology company specializing in internet-related services and products including search engine, online advertising technologies, cloud computing, software, and hardware.
Key services
Search engine, Advertising, Cloud services, Email, Maps, Mobile OS
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Fonts, SVG, HTML5, CSS3
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
95/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure cookies
  • Content Security Policy

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Marketing tools
Google Ads
Transparency
excellent

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable or protected, typical for large brands
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies present with consent mechanisms
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage
  5. Strong security posture with HTTPS and security headers
  6. Extensive use of Google-owned domains and services
  7. High-quality, professional website design and user experience
Technical notes

Notes

The website infrastructure is built on modern web standards with optimized performance and mobile responsiveness. Use of Google Fonts, SVG graphics, and asynchronous JavaScript loading contributes to fast load times and good user experience. The site shows no signs of technical debt or outdated technologies. SEO is well implemented with appropriate meta tags and structured data. Accessibility features are present but could be further enhanced. Hosting details are not explicitly available but are presumed to be on Google’s own infrastructure, ensuring high availability and scalability.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 79/100Low23 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with google.bj. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review google.bj.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.