Skip to main content

Security report for google.bg

Google LLC · Technology · United States

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Google LLC is a global leader in internet-related services and products, primarily known for its search engine, advertising platforms, cloud computing, and software offerings. As a subsidiary of Alphabet Inc., Google holds a dominant market position with a broad portfolio of services targeting general consumers and businesses worldwide. The website reflects a high level of professionalism, brand consistency, and user-centric design, catering to a global audience with fast, accessible, and mobile-optimized interfaces. Technically, Google employs a sophisticated and proprietary technology stack, leveraging modern web standards, Google Cloud hosting, and advanced analytics tools. The site demonstrates excellent performance, accessibility, and SEO optimization, ensuring a seamless user experience across devices. Security is robust, with HTTPS enforcement, comprehensive security headers, and adherence to best practices, minimizing vulnerabilities and protecting user data. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear, comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, including GDPR adherence and user consent mechanisms. Although direct contact information is not prominently displayed, the site provides extensive support and policy documentation. Overall, Google’s website exemplifies a mature digital infrastructure with strong security and privacy postures, supporting its enterprise-scale operations. Strategically, Google should maintain its current security and privacy standards, continue monitoring emerging threats, and enhance transparency around data protection and incident response to sustain user trust and regulatory compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching google.bg

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
60
Email security
83
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Google’s market positioning as the leading search engine and advertising platform provides significant competitive advantages, including vast data resources and a diversified business model spanning advertising, cloud services, hardware, and AI research. Revenue streams are primarily driven by advertising but also include cloud computing and hardware sales. The target customer segments range from individual users to large enterprises. Growth indicators include continuous innovation and expansion into new technology sectors. The partnership ecosystem includes subsidiaries like YouTube and Android, reinforcing Google’s market dominance and technological breadth.

Security posture

Google exhibits a high security maturity level with enforced HTTPS, modern TLS configurations, and comprehensive security headers. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations is evident through detailed policies and consent mechanisms. Incident response and security policy pages were not explicitly found but are likely managed internally given the company’s scale. The security culture is reflected in the site’s design and operational practices, emphasizing user data protection and secure communications.

Recommendations

  1. Maintain and regularly update security headers and TLS configurations to address emerging threats.
  2. Enhance public visibility of incident response procedures and security contact channels to improve transparency.
  3. Continue rigorous privacy compliance audits and update policies to reflect regulatory changes.
  4. Expand user education on data protection and privacy settings to strengthen trust.
  5. Invest in ongoing modernization of technical infrastructure to sustain performance and security.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Google LLC
Description
Google LLC operates a global search engine and provides a wide range of internet-related services and products including advertising technologies, cloud computing, software, and hardware.
Key services
Search engine, Advertising, Cloud services, Software products, Hardware products
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, HTML5, CSS3, Google Fonts, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Proprietary Google frameworks
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
excellent
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
95/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • secure cookies
  • modern TLS versions
  • security headers present

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Marketing tools
Google Ads, Google Marketing Platform
Transparency
excellent

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible and functional
  2. No signs of blocking or WAF challenges
  3. Content is professional and consistent with a major technology company
  4. Strong security posture with modern best practices
  5. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies present
  6. No direct contact information visible on homepage
  7. Use of Google proprietary technologies and hosting
  8. High trust and brand recognition
Technical notes

Notes

The website infrastructure is built on a proprietary Google technology stack with extensive use of JavaScript, CSS, and Google Fonts. Hosting is provided by Google Cloud Platform, ensuring high availability and scalability. Performance metrics indicate fast loading times and excellent mobile optimization. Accessibility features are well implemented, supporting diverse user needs. SEO practices are comprehensive, including proper meta tags and structured data. The site shows no signs of technical debt or outdated components, reflecting continuous modernization and maintenance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 78/100Low23 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with google.bg. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review google.bg.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.