Skip to main content

Security report for goodlift.info

Internet Invest, Ltd. dba Imena.ua · Other · Ukraine

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GOODLIFT.INFO is a specialized website dedicated to providing official and verified information about powerlifting competitions, events, and athletes affiliated with the International Powerlifting Federation (IPF). The site supports competition management through the GOODLIFT software, which is the official competition management tool for IPF. The target audience includes powerlifting athletes, teams, federations, and enthusiasts seeking authoritative competition data and rankings. The business operates primarily as an information and software support service within the niche sports sector, maintaining a consistent and professional online presence since 2008. Technically, the website employs a straightforward HTML, CSS, and JavaScript stack without reliance on modern CMS or frameworks. Hosting and domain registration are managed by Internet Invest, Ltd. dba Imena.ua, a Ukrainian registrar, consistent with the site's author and content origin. The site demonstrates moderate performance and basic mobile optimization, with good SEO practices evident in meta tags and structured navigation. However, there is room for improvement in accessibility and modern technical enhancements. From a security perspective, the site lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC, which are recommended to enhance protection against common web threats. The domain is secured with clientTransferProhibited status, and WHOIS data is transparent and consistent, supporting legitimacy. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism or GDPR compliance indicators. No incident response or security policy information is published, which could be improved to strengthen trust. Overall, GOODLIFT.INFO is a credible and authoritative resource within its niche, with a solid business foundation and consistent branding. Security and privacy practices require enhancement to meet modern standards and regulatory requirements. Strategic improvements in security headers, DNSSEC, cookie consent, and published policies would elevate the site's trustworthiness and compliance posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: RDP

      Port 3389 (RDP) is publicly accessible - RDP - Remote Desktop, prime ransomware target

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to RDP using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching goodlift.info

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
53
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GOODLIFT.INFO holds a strong market position as the official information and software provider for the International Powerlifting Federation and related European federations. Its competitive advantage lies in its official affiliation and exclusive use of the GOODLIFT competition management software. The business model focuses on delivering verified competition data, rankings, and live event updates to a specialized audience of athletes and federations. Revenue streams likely include software licensing and possibly sponsorship or advertising, though no explicit monetization is visible on the site. The partnership ecosystem includes close ties with IPF and EPF, as well as presence on YouTube channels dedicated to powerlifting content. Growth indicators include long domain tenure and ongoing event updates. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to expand digital presence and enhance user engagement through modern web technologies and compliance improvements.

Security posture

The current security maturity level of GOODLIFT.INFO is moderate. The domain is protected against unauthorized transfers, and WHOIS data is transparent and consistent. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options exposes the site to potential risks like DNS spoofing and clickjacking. The lack of HTTPS enforcement details limits assessment but is critical for secure data transmission. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Compliance gaps exist regarding GDPR and cookie consent mechanisms. Incident response readiness is unclear due to missing published policies or dedicated security contacts. Overall, the security culture appears basic, with room for significant improvement to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and enforce HTTPS site-wide with a valid SSL certificate.
  3. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response contact information.
  5. Introduce a cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and enhance privacy transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Internet Invest, Ltd. dba Imena.ua
Description
Provides official and verified information about powerlifting competitions, events, and people related to the International Powerlifting Federation (IPF). It supports competition management via GOODLIFT software, the official IPF competition management software.
Key services
Powerlifting competition results, Rankings, Records, Nomination management, Live event updates
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML, CSS, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is an official information portal for IPF powerlifting competitions.
  2. Content is well-structured with clear navigation menus.
  3. No forms detected on the homepage; login page exists but not analyzed here.
  4. No social media links except YouTube channels related to powerlifting.
  5. No cookie consent or tracking detected.
  6. No visible security headers or advanced security policies published.
  7. WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with business claims.
  8. Website uses multiple name servers from srv53.net and srv53.org domains.
  9. No DNSSEC enabled, which is a security improvement opportunity.
  10. No terms of service or security policy pages found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a traditional HTML and CSS foundation with some JavaScript, without modern CMS or frameworks detected. The hosting and domain registration are managed by a Ukrainian registrar consistent with the site's origin. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is well addressed through meta tags and structured navigation. Technical debt is low but modernization opportunities exist, including adopting responsive design frameworks, improving accessibility compliance, and integrating modern security practices. The absence of analytics or tracking scripts suggests minimal data collection, which aligns with privacy considerations but limits marketing insights.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with goodlift.info. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review goodlift.info.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.