Skip to main content

Security report for gongguan.net

天峰律政 · Other · China

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

天峰律政 is a Chinese network public relations company specializing in brand reputation maintenance and negative public opinion management, integrating legal and PR expertise. The company targets enterprises seeking to protect and enhance their brand image through professional legal and PR services. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation and content relevant to its business domain, though it lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies. Technically, the site uses JavaScript-based analytics and browser compatibility checks but lacks visible security headers and HTTPS enforcement information. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, impacting trustworthiness. Overall, the site presents a moderate risk profile with room for improvement in security and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gongguan.net

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a specialized PR firm with a legal background, serving corporate clients in China. Its business model revolves around providing crisis management, negative content suppression, and brand reputation services. The firm emphasizes professional legal review and rapid response capabilities. The website content and structure support a small-sized enterprise with a focused service offering. The lack of WHOIS data and privacy policies suggests gaps in transparency and regulatory compliance. No social media or partner domains are linked, indicating a possibly isolated digital presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates basic security practices such as browser compatibility checks and uses HTTPS (assumed but not confirmed). However, no security headers like CSP, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options were detected, and no incident response or security policy information is published. The absence of privacy and cookie policies further weakens compliance posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified in the HTML content. The security score is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing standard security headers, publishing policies, and ensuring domain registration transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS configuration.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and local regulations.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information.
  4. Configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS.
  5. Verify and update WHOIS registration data to improve domain legitimacy and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
天峰律政
Description
天峰律政(广州一联一公关),一家法律与公关领域融合的网络公关公司。多年来从事企业品牌声誉维护、公关负面处理,是一家专业舆情公关公司。
Key services
企业声誉挽回, 制止负面发酵, 网络负面检测, 快速广泛传播, 公关负面处理, 法律服务方案
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, XMLHttpRequest, Baidu Analytics, Custom JS SDK (hawkEye), Browser detection scripts
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Browser compatibility check
  • Redirect on unsupported browsers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Baidu Analytics, hawkEye
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Baidu Analytics
Marketing tools
hawkEye analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is in Chinese with some English headings
  2. Focus on legal and public relations services for brand reputation
  3. No visible privacy or cookie policies
  4. Contact info clearly displayed in footer and floating widget
  5. No forms detected that collect user data
  6. Use of Baidu analytics and custom tracking scripts
  7. No social media links explicitly found
  8. Professional design and clear navigation
  9. No security headers or HTTPS enforcement info available
  10. WHOIS data missing, raising legitimacy concerns
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a custom or proprietary CMS platform with JavaScript-based analytics (Baidu and hawkEye). It includes browser detection and redirection scripts to handle unsupported browsers. The site is moderately optimized for mobile and SEO with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of slow loading. Accessibility features are basic, and no ARIA or advanced accessibility tags were detected. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from improved security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gongguan.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gongguan.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.