Skip to main content

Security report for goneo.email

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Email security, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The goneo.email website serves as a webmail portal for goneo email customers, providing access to email services powered by the Group-Office platform. The site is primarily a login interface with minimal content beyond authentication forms. The business appears to focus on email hosting and management services targeted at goneo customers, with no direct marketing or extensive business information presented on this page. The domain is active and maintained with privacy-protected WHOIS data, consistent with typical hosting service practices. Technically, the site uses ExtJS 3 framework and standard web technologies such as JavaScript, CSS, and HTML5. It enforces HTTPS and uses security tokens for AJAX requests, indicating a baseline security posture. However, the absence of explicit security headers and privacy/cookie policies suggests room for improvement in compliance and security best practices. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile use but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. From a security perspective, the site shows no signs of WAF blocking or content filtering, and no vulnerabilities are evident from the HTML content. The lack of exposed sensitive data and use of HTTPS are positive indicators. However, the missing security headers and privacy policies reduce the overall security and privacy compliance score. No contact or incident response information is publicly available, which could impact user trust and compliance. Overall, the website is functional and serves its purpose as a webmail login portal but would benefit from enhanced privacy disclosures, security headers, and contact information to improve trust and compliance. Strategic recommendations include implementing comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, adding security headers, and improving accessibility and SEO to enhance user experience and regulatory compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching goneo.email

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
85
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

goneo.email operates as a specialized email service portal for goneo customers, leveraging Group-Office software for webmail functionality. The business model centers on providing email hosting and management services, likely as part of a broader hosting or internet service offering by goneo. The target audience is existing goneo email users requiring webmail access. The site does not reveal detailed market positioning or revenue streams but indicates a focus on essential email services rather than broader digital products. The absence of marketing or advertising elements suggests a service-oriented approach rather than direct consumer sales. The partnership with Group-Office indicates reliance on established software solutions to deliver services efficiently. The domain's privacy-protected WHOIS data aligns with typical hosting provider practices to safeguard registrant information. Overall, the business appears stable but with limited public-facing business intelligence available from this page alone.

Security posture

The security posture of goneo.email is moderate. The site enforces HTTPS and uses security tokens in AJAX requests, which are positive security controls. However, the lack of common security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks like clickjacking and MIME sniffing. No privacy or cookie policies are present, which may impact GDPR compliance. The absence of contact information for incident response or security reporting channels limits transparency and user trust. No signs of WAF or security blocking mechanisms were detected, indicating open access but also potential exposure to automated attacks if not otherwise protected. Overall, the site demonstrates basic security hygiene but should enhance header policies and privacy disclosures to improve its security maturity and compliance posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against web vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish clear contact information and incident response channels to improve transparency and support.
  4. Enhance accessibility and SEO features to improve user experience and discoverability.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and frameworks to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Webmail service interface for goneo email accounts, powered by Group-Office software.
Key services
Webmail access, Email management
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
ExtJS 3, JavaScript, CSS, HTML5
Frameworks
Group-Office
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security token used in AJAX requests

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a webmail login portal for goneo.email domain.
  2. Powered by Group-Office software.
  3. No public WHOIS data available; domain uses privacy protection.
  4. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the login page.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers visible on the login page.
  6. No social media links or marketing/advertising scripts detected.
  7. Site uses HTTPS and security tokens for AJAX requests.
  8. No explicit security headers detected in HTML content.
  9. Content is minimal and focused on login functionality.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using ExtJS 3 framework with JavaScript, CSS, and HTML5 technologies. It integrates Group-Office software for webmail functionality. The site uses HTTPS with security tokens for AJAX requests, indicating secure communication and session management. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization. However, the site lacks modern SEO and accessibility features, and no CMS or hosting provider information is discernible from the content. The absence of security headers and privacy policies indicates technical debt in compliance and security best practices. The site’s minimal content and focused functionality reduce complexity but also limit opportunities for richer user engagement or marketing. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with goneo.email. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review goneo.email.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.