Skip to main content

Security report for golisto.com

Golisto ApS · E-commerce · Denmark

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Golisto ApS operates an online marketplace platform dedicated to collectors, enabling them to safely buy and sell collectibles. The platform supports auctions, direct sales, and community engagement, positioning itself as a fast-growing marketplace in the collectibles niche. The website targets collectors and enthusiasts, offering a curated and trusted environment with a growing user base of over 25,000 collectors. Technically, the site is built on modern web technologies including React and Next.js, hosted likely on DigitalOcean, and integrates third-party services such as Facebook SDK, OneSignal for notifications, and Crisp Chat for customer support. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices, though some accessibility features could be improved. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS, uses clientTransferProhibited domain status, and integrates reputable payment methods. However, it lacks DNSSEC, Content-Security-Policy headers, and a formal vulnerability disclosure or incident response policy. Privacy compliance is addressed via iubenda-hosted policies, but no explicit cookie consent mechanism is present. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and technically sound with room for security and compliance enhancements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching golisto.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Golisto's market positioning as a niche collectibles marketplace leverages community trust and specialized services like auctions and fresh listings. Its business model is primarily e-commerce with revenue likely from transaction fees or listing fees. The company maintains active social media channels and partners with Mangopay for payment processing, indicating a mature payment infrastructure. The absence of phone or physical address contact details suggests a digital-first approach. Growth indicators include a sizable user base and frequent new listings. Strategic partnerships and transparent policies enhance credibility. The company is small-sized, founded in 2014, and focused on the European market, specifically Denmark.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protection. However, the absence of DNSSEC, CSP headers, and a security.txt file indicates gaps in defense-in-depth and vulnerability management. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Privacy policies are comprehensive but lack explicit cookie consent mechanisms. Incident response readiness is unclear due to missing contact channels for security issues. The integration of third-party scripts like Facebook Pixel and Crisp Chat introduces moderate tracking and potential privacy considerations. Overall, the security posture is adequate for an e-commerce platform but would benefit from enhanced DNS security, security headers, and formal incident response documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement a Content-Security-Policy header to mitigate cross-site scripting and related attacks.
  3. Add a security.txt file and clearly publish incident response contact information to improve vulnerability disclosure and response.
  4. Introduce a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply fully with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking pixels to minimize privacy risks and improve compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Golisto ApS
Description
Join 25.000+ collectors to safely buy & sell your favourite collectibles!
Key services
Marketplace for collectibles, Auctions, Selling platform
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, JavaScript, Facebook SDK, OneSignal, Crisp Chat
Frameworks
Next.js, React
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • No DNSSEC enabled (recommend enabling)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook SDK, OneSignal, Crisp Chat
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a specialized marketplace for collectors
  2. Strong social media presence with official accounts linked
  3. Payment options are diverse and reputable
  4. No phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly listed
  5. Privacy and terms policies hosted on iubenda, indicating professional compliance approach
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies found on site
  7. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks
  8. No DNSSEC enabled, which is a minor security gap
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern React and Next.js framework stack, enabling server-side rendering and good SEO. Hosting appears to be on DigitalOcean, inferred from asset URLs. The site loads multiple JavaScript chunks asynchronously, indicating modular code splitting for performance. Integration with Facebook SDK, OneSignal, and Crisp Chat provides marketing, notification, and support capabilities. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and preloaded assets for performance. However, accessibility features are basic and could be improved. SEO is supported by comprehensive meta tags including Open Graph and Twitter cards. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or headless CMS solution. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization in asset loading and caching.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with golisto.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review golisto.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.