Skip to main content

Security report for goldmangraff.si

Other · Slovenia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website goldmangraff.si is currently inaccessible beyond a robot challenge screen designed to verify visitors are not automated bots. This challenge page uses JavaScript-based proof-of-work computations to mitigate automated access, indicating the presence of a Web Application Firewall or similar security mechanism. Due to this blocking, no substantive business content, contact information, or policies are available for analysis. The domain is newly registered in August 2023 and hosted by Plus Hosting Grupa d.o.o., a legitimate hosting provider in Slovenia. The technical infrastructure includes modern JavaScript cryptographic functions and Web Workers for client-side challenge processing, but lacks visible security headers or HTTPS enforcement details in the provided data. Overall, the site’s security posture shows basic bot mitigation but lacks transparency in privacy, cookie, and contact policies, limiting trust and compliance evaluation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL

      Port 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to PostgreSQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching goldmangraff.si

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
25
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Given the absence of accessible business content, no clear market positioning, business model, or service offerings can be determined. The domain’s recent registration suggests a new or developing project. Hosting by a known provider adds legitimacy, but the lack of contact or corporate information limits business credibility. No partnerships or related domains are identified. The target audience appears general but cannot be confirmed due to content blocking.

Security posture

The site employs a JavaScript-based robot challenge to prevent automated access, which is a positive security control against bots and scraping. However, no security headers or HTTPS enforcement details are visible, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps. The security score is moderate due to the challenge mechanism but limited by lack of transparency and policy documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publicly display comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add clear contact information including security incident response contacts to enhance transparency and readiness.
  3. Ensure HTTPS is enforced and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are configured.
  4. Provide fallback mechanisms and user-friendly error handling for the CAPTCHA challenge to improve user experience.
  5. Develop and publish vulnerability disclosure and security policies to demonstrate commitment to security best practices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. Page is a JavaScript-based robot challenge screen indicating a WAF or security challenge blocking direct access. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Description
This page is a security challenge page designed to verify the visitor is not a robot before allowing access to the main site.
Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Web Crypto API, SHA1 hashing, Blob URLs, Web Workers
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of client_update_prohibited domain status
  • Use of JavaScript-based proof-of-work CAPTCHA challenge

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is blocked by a JavaScript-based robot challenge page.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact information or business details provided on the page.
  4. No visible security headers or HTTPS information in the provided data.
  5. External resources loaded from a Cloudfront CDN domain.
  6. WHOIS data shows domain is newly registered and hosted by a known hosting provider.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  8. No advertising or marketing tools detected.
  9. Page is minimal and designed solely for bot mitigation.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses advanced client-side JavaScript including Web Crypto API, SHA1 hashing, and Web Workers to implement a proof-of-work CAPTCHA challenge. Hosting is provided by Plus Hosting Grupa d.o.o., with DNS servers at siteground.net. The page is minimal and focused solely on bot mitigation, with no CMS or frameworks detected. Performance is moderate given the computational challenge, and mobile optimization is basic. SEO and accessibility are poor due to lack of content and metadata. No analytics or marketing tools are detected.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with goldmangraff.si. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review goldmangraff.si.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.