Skip to main content

Security report for goldcoin.co.in

Other · N/a

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

44/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website goldcoin.co.in currently presents minimal content, consisting solely of a client-side redirect script to the /lander path. There is no visible business information, metadata, or user-facing content to analyze. The domain resolves to two Amazon AWS IP addresses, indicating hosting on cloud infrastructure, but lacks a valid SSL/TLS certificate and does not support HTTPS, which severely impacts security and trustworthiness. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are present, and no contact information or business credentials are available on the site. This suggests the website is either under development or improperly configured. From a technical perspective, the site lacks modern web standards such as security headers, DNSSEC, and CAA records. Performance data is unavailable due to the lack of content. The absence of analytics, advertising, or tracking scripts indicates minimal digital marketing or user engagement infrastructure. The DNS setup is standard but could be improved with security enhancements. Security posture is poor, with no SSL certificate, no HTTPS support, and no security best practices implemented. This exposes visitors to risks and undermines trust. The WHOIS data shows the domain is registered and DNS is consistent, but no registrant or business information was provided to verify legitimacy. Overall, the site scores very low on content quality, technical implementation, security, privacy compliance, and business credibility. Strategic recommendations include immediate implementation of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS, development of meaningful website content including privacy and cookie policies, addition of contact and business information, and deployment of security headers and DNS security features. These steps are critical to improve trust, compliance, and user experience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
15/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching goldcoin.co.in

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
15
Average
44

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the absence of any business-related content, metadata, or structured data on the website, no meaningful business intelligence can be derived. The domain name suggests a possible association with gold or financial services, but no explicit information confirms this. There are no indications of market positioning, revenue streams, or customer segments. The lack of contact details and company credentials further limits any business insights. The domain appears to be registered and hosted on AWS, which is common for many businesses, but without content, the business model and operations remain unknown.

Security posture

The security posture of goldcoin.co.in is currently very weak. The site does not have a valid SSL/TLS certificate and does not support HTTPS, exposing users to potential interception and man-in-the-middle attacks. No security headers are configured, and DNS security features such as DNSSEC and CAA records are absent. There is no evidence of incident response policies, vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, or security certifications. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations. Overall, the site is vulnerable to multiple security risks and does not follow best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and install a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Develop and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  3. Add clear contact information including email, phone, and physical address to improve business credibility.
  4. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Enable DNSSEC and configure CAA records to enhance DNS security and prevent certificate mis-issuance.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on Amazon AWS infrastructure with two A records pointing to AWS IP addresses. DNS is configured with standard NS records but lacks DNSSEC and CAA records. The HTTP response headers are minimal, with only content-type, date, and content-length present. No SSL certificate is installed, and no TLS protocols are supported. The HTML content is minimal, containing only a JavaScript redirect to /lander, with no metadata, forms, or external resources. Performance metrics are unavailable due to lack of content. No CMS or frameworks are detected. The site is not mobile optimized and lacks accessibility and SEO features. Overall, the technical implementation is incomplete and requires significant development and security improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with goldcoin.co.in. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review goldcoin.co.in.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.