Skip to main content

Security report for goksitesvergelijker.nl

team.blue nl B.V. · Other · Netherlands

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Goksitesvergelijker.nl is a Dutch online gambling comparison website operated under the registrar and hosting of team.blue nl B.V. The site focuses on providing independent reviews and comparisons of licensed Dutch gambling sites, emphasizing safety, reliability, and compliance with the Dutch Kansspelautoriteit (Ksa) regulations. It targets adult Dutch players seeking trustworthy online casinos and sports betting platforms. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and uses structured data for SEO. It employs Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking but lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, which is a compliance gap. Security posture is decent with HTTPS and DNSSEC enabled, but missing security headers and presence of some unknown external scripts suggest room for improvement. Overall, the site is professional, content-rich, and trustworthy within its niche but should enhance privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching goksitesvergelijker.nl

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
40
Email security
40
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website occupies a niche position in the Dutch online gambling market, leveraging affiliate marketing by promoting Ksa-licensed gambling operators. Its business model is content-driven, providing detailed reviews, comparisons, and gambling information to attract and convert visitors. The site benefits from the growing legalization and regulation of online gambling in the Netherlands since 2021. Partnerships with known casinos like Jacks.nl enhance credibility and revenue potential. The target audience is adult Dutch gamblers looking for safe and legal gambling options. The site’s content quality and SEO efforts support good organic reach, but lack of direct contact info and privacy policies may limit trust for some users.

Security posture

The site uses HTTPS with DNSSEC enabled, indicating a secure domain and transport layer. However, no explicit security headers were detected, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. The use of third-party scripts from less known domains (tnoodlezy.com, vibedroom.org, varinspector.com) could pose risks if not properly vetted. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerabilities were found in the HTML content. The absence of incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies suggests limited formal security governance. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security posture is moderate but can be improved by implementing security headers, vetting third-party scripts, and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit GDPR compliance and implement a cookie consent mechanism.
  3. Establish and publish an incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy, including a security.txt file for responsible reporting.
  4. Review and vet all third-party scripts, especially those from unknown domains, to mitigate potential security risks.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
team.blue nl B.V.
Description
Goksitesvergelijker.nl biedt onafhankelijke vergelijkingen en reviews van Nederlandse goksites met Ksa vergunning, gericht op veilig en betrouwbaar online gokken. De site informeert over gokspellen, live casino, sportweddenschappen, bonussen en verantwoord spelen.
Key services
Goksite reviews, Goksites vergelijken, Informatie over online gokken, Nieuws en tips over gokken
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Ultimate Addons for Gutenberg, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Slick Carousel, Fancybox
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • DNSSEC enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of nofollow on affiliate links

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is comprehensive about Dutch online gambling, focusing on legal and licensed operators.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policy pages found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. Affiliate marketing is evident with clear nofollow links to partner casinos.
  5. Use of modern WordPress plugins and structured data for SEO.
  6. Some external scripts from less known domains (tnoodlezy.com, vibedroom.org, varinspector.com) may warrant review for security.
  7. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; only a search form is present.
  8. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  9. Good mobile optimization and responsive design.
  10. Content safety rating is safe but targeted to adults due to gambling content and 18+ age restriction.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Ultimate Addons for Gutenberg, and popular JavaScript libraries like Slick Carousel and Fancybox. It uses Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking user behavior. The site is hosted by team.blue nl B.V., with DNSSEC enabled and active domain status. Performance is moderate with multiple CSS files preloaded and asynchronous script loading. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design and accessible navigation. SEO is supported by structured data (JSON-LD), Open Graph tags, and meta tags. However, the site lacks explicit security headers and privacy compliance features, which are technical debt areas. Overall, the infrastructure is solid but can benefit from security and privacy enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with goksitesvergelijker.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review goksitesvergelijker.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.