Skip to main content

Security report for gofrebalt.lv

SIA Gofre Baltija · Other · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA Gofre Baltija is a Latvian company established in 1998 specializing in the collection, sorting, and sale of secondary raw materials such as waste paper, cardboard, polyethylene, and used packaging. The company also wholesales corrugated cardboard packaging materials to manufacturing and printing firms primarily in Riga and its surroundings. The website content is professionally presented but lacks modern technical and privacy compliance features. The technical infrastructure relies on older JavaScript libraries and basic HTML/CSS without a detected CMS or advanced frameworks. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS usage implied but no visible security headers or privacy policies. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain legitimacy verification, but business information and contact details are clearly provided, supporting moderate trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gofrebalt.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in a niche waste management and packaging wholesale sector with a local focus. Its long-standing partnership with Latvijas Zaļais Punkts indicates a stable market position and compliance with environmental regulations. The business model combines service provision for waste collection and raw material processing with product wholesale. The target customers are primarily businesses in Riga requiring recycling services and packaging materials. The website's limited digital maturity and lack of privacy and security policies suggest opportunities for modernization and compliance improvements. No evident partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS usage but lacks important security headers and uses outdated JavaScript libraries, which may expose it to vulnerabilities. No forms or sensitive data collection points are visible, reducing immediate risk. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. Incident response and security policy information are not provided, limiting transparency. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with recommendations to update libraries, implement security headers, and publish privacy and cookie policies.

Recommendations

  1. Update all JavaScript libraries to current secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Enhance mobile responsiveness and accessibility to improve user experience and SEO.
  5. Establish and publish incident response and security policy information to demonstrate security culture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA Gofre Baltija
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA Gofre Baltija
Description
SIA Gofre Baltija provides services related to collection, acceptance, sorting, pressing, and sale of secondary raw materials such as waste paper, cardboard, polyethylene, film, and used packaging. The company also wholesales corrugated cardboard packaging materials and supplies sheets and boxes to manufacturing, packaging, and printing companies. It operates primarily in Riga and surrounding areas since 1998.
Key services
Collection and management of secondary raw materials, Sorting and preparation of raw materials for recycling, Wholesale of corrugated cardboard packaging and paper products
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML, CSS, JavaScript, jQuery 1.3.2, Prototype.js, Scriptaculous, Lightbox
Performance
moderate
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by https URL)
  • No visible forms collecting sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is in Latvian language with some German language URL parameter but content is Latvian
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found
  3. Contact information clearly provided in footer
  4. Use of outdated JavaScript libraries
  5. No visible forms on the page
  6. Google Analytics used for tracking
  7. No social media links found
  8. No security headers visible in provided data
  9. No WHOIS data available due to query limit
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses legacy JavaScript libraries including jQuery 1.3.2 and Prototype.js, which are outdated and potentially vulnerable. The HTML and CSS are basic with no detected CMS or modern frameworks. Google Analytics is used for tracking, but no advanced marketing or retargeting tools are present. The site lacks mobile optimization and accessibility features. Performance is moderate but could be improved with modernization. No hosting provider or platform information is discernible from the content. Overall, the technical stack is functional but dated, posing risks and limiting scalability.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gofrebalt.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gofrebalt.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.