Skip to main content

Security report for godollo.hu

Gödöllő Város Önkormányzata · Government · Hungary

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Gödöllő Város Önkormányzata operates as the official municipal government website for the city of Gödöllő, Hungary. It provides residents and visitors with essential information about local governance, public services, news, and community resources. The website is positioned as a trusted source for municipal data and citizen engagement, reflecting the city's identity and growth near Budapest. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using the Astra theme and Elementor page builder, incorporating modern SEO practices and accessibility features. The presence of structured data and cookie consent mechanisms indicates a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though additional security headers could enhance protection. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear policies and consent management. Overall, the site demonstrates a professional, trustworthy, and user-friendly platform for local government communication.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching godollo.hu

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
65
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
40
Average
55
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website serves a medium-sized government entity focused on public administration and citizen services. Its business model centers on information dissemination and community engagement rather than commercial activities. The site targets local residents, businesses, and visitors, providing structured navigation to various municipal departments and services. The use of partner domains like kozadat.hu and ohp-20.asp.lgov.hu suggests integration with national public data and government portals. The digital presence supports transparency and accessibility, key for government trust and compliance. Growth indicators include regular content updates and adoption of modern web technologies. The partnership ecosystem is limited to governmental and public service domains, reflecting the site's official nature.

Security posture

The website exhibits a good security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. There is no published security policy or incident response contact, which are recommended for government sites handling citizen data. The site uses Google Analytics and Tag Manager with consent management, aligning with privacy regulations. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be strengthened by adopting additional HTTP headers and formalizing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and readiness.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Conduct periodic security audits and penetration testing to proactively identify and address risks.
  5. Enhance user trust by providing clear contact details including official emails and phone numbers on the website.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Gödöllő Város Önkormányzata
Description
Gödöllő Város Önkormányzata is the municipal government of Gödöllő, Hungary, providing local governance and public services. The website welcomes visitors and highlights the city's growth and proximity to Budapest.
Key services
Municipal news and announcements, Public administration and governance information, Citizen services and contact points, Digital maps and local infrastructure information, Health and social services information
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, JetMenu, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Astra Theme, Rank Math SEO
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager with consent management

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Rank Math SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Official municipal government website for Gödöllő city in Hungary.
  2. Compliant with GDPR and cookie consent regulations.
  3. Uses modern WordPress CMS with Elementor and Astra theme.
  4. Includes accessibility features and an accessibility toolbar.
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  6. Good SEO and structured data implementation.
  7. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided HTML snippet; contact likely via web forms.
  8. No terms of service page detected.
  9. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using the Astra theme and Elementor page builder, which supports responsive design and accessibility. SEO is enhanced via the Rank Math plugin and structured data in JSON-LD format. Performance is moderate, with external dependencies on Google Fonts, Google Analytics, and Tag Manager. Accessibility features include an accessibility toolbar and skip links. The site uses multiple Jet plugins for menus and tabs, indicating a modular and extensible architecture. Hosting provider details are not explicit, but HTTPS and performance suggest a reliable environment. Technical risks are minimal but depend on timely updates and security best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with godollo.hu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review godollo.hu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.