Skip to main content

Security report for godefense.fr

Other · France

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website godefense.fr is currently inaccessible due to a Cloudflare Turnstile security challenge page, which blocks direct access to its content. As a result, no business descriptive content, contact information, or compliance documentation is available for analysis. The domain is registered since 2013 with Scaleway as registrar, indicating a legitimate and established registration. However, the lack of accessible content limits the ability to assess the company's market position, services, or technical maturity. The technical infrastructure includes Cloudflare security mechanisms but no visible CMS or analytics tools. Security posture is difficult to evaluate fully due to blocked content, but the presence of Cloudflare WAF indicates some level of protection. Overall, the site scores low on content quality and privacy compliance due to inaccessibility, with recommendations to reduce blocking for better transparency and trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching godefense.fr

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
55
Email security
40
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the Cloudflare WAF challenge, no direct business intelligence can be extracted from the website content. The domain age and registrar suggest a stable presence since 2013 in France. No information on business model, revenue streams, or partnerships is available. The absence of contact details or policies limits insights into customer engagement or compliance maturity. The website appears to be protected by Cloudflare services, which may indicate a focus on security but also reduces visibility for external analysis.

Security posture

The website is protected by Cloudflare's security challenge (Turnstile captcha), which effectively blocks automated access and may prevent some attacks. However, no security headers or detailed SSL configuration data are available from the provided content. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerabilities are visible, but the lack of accessible content prevents a thorough security assessment. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present. The security posture is moderate due to the use of Cloudflare WAF but lacks transparency and visible best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Reduce or configure Cloudflare WAF challenge to allow legitimate user and crawler access for transparency.
  2. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and build user trust.
  3. Add visible contact information including support and security incident contacts.
  4. Implement security headers and document security policies publicly.
  5. Consider adding vulnerability disclosure and incident response information to improve security culture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Cloudflare detected. Website is behind a Cloudflare security challenge page with Turnstile captcha, blocking direct content access. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Technology

Stack
Cloudflare Turnstile, JavaScript, HTML5, CSS3

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is fully blocked by Cloudflare Turnstile security challenge.
  2. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact information or business details are accessible.
  4. Only external link is to Cloudflare domain for security scripts.
  5. WHOIS data shows domain is active, registered since 2013, with Scaleway as registrar.
  6. No analytics or advertising scripts detected beyond Cloudflare security.
  7. No forms or data collection fields visible except hidden Turnstile response input.
  8. No social media or email contacts found in accessible content.
  9. Website title is generic 'Just a moment...' indicating challenge page.
  10. No security headers or SSL configuration details available from provided data.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Cloudflare Turnstile captcha for bot mitigation, indicating modern security tooling. Hosting is provided by Scaleway, a reputable provider. No CMS or additional frameworks are detected in the HTML content. The site uses standard HTML5 and CSS3 with JavaScript for the challenge page. Performance and SEO cannot be assessed due to blocked content. Mobile optimization and accessibility cannot be evaluated. The technical stack is minimal and focused on security challenge rather than content delivery.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with godefense.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review godefense.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.