Skip to main content

Security report for goddess.me

E-commerce · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Goddess.me is an e-commerce website focused on selling toys, likely adult-oriented given the iconography and product references. The site presents a basic online retail platform with limited content and minimal metadata. The technical infrastructure includes standard JavaScript libraries such as Google Tag Manager and a cookie consent script, indicating some attention to user tracking and privacy compliance, though no formal privacy or terms of service pages are found. The website is mobile optimized and uses responsive design but lacks advanced SEO due to restrictive meta robots tags. Security posture is minimal with no visible security headers and incomplete WHOIS data, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy and transparency. Overall, the site appears functional but lacks critical trust and compliance elements necessary for higher confidence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching goddess.me

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
45
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention goddess.me, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for goddess.me right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the e-commerce sector targeting consumers interested in toys. The business model is direct online retail without visible partner or subsidiary domains. The lack of contact information and business certifications limits trust and credibility. The site uses basic marketing tools like Google Tag Manager but does not demonstrate advanced analytics or advertising networks. The absence of privacy and terms policies suggests a gap in compliance. The company size appears small with no indication of parent or subsidiary companies. Market positioning and growth indicators are not discernible from the available data.

Security posture

Security maturity is low. The site uses HTTPS (implied by canonical URL) but lacks security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others. No incident response or security policy information is provided. WHOIS data is incomplete and malformed, which is a red flag for domain legitimacy. Cookie consent is implemented, but GDPR compliance is uncertain due to missing privacy policy. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site would benefit from a security audit and improved transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add clear contact information including company email, phone number, and physical address to enhance business credibility.
  3. Improve security posture by adding standard security headers and conducting vulnerability assessments.
  4. Clarify WHOIS registration details or use a reputable registrar with transparent data to improve domain trustworthiness.
  5. Enhance SEO by adjusting meta robots tags and improving metadata for better search engine visibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Toy Store
Key services
Online sales of toys
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Cookie Script
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is an e-commerce toy store with minimal content and metadata
  2. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found
  5. No security headers detected in HTML content
  6. WHOIS data is malformed and lacks critical registration details
  7. No social media links or business certifications found
  8. Website uses Google Tag Manager and cookie-script.com for tracking and consent
  9. SEO is limited due to meta robots tag set to NOINDEX, NOFOLLOW
  10. Website design and content quality are basic with moderate branding consistency
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses standard web technologies including JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, and a third-party cookie consent script. The HTML is valid but the meta robots tag restricts indexing, limiting SEO effectiveness. The site is responsive and mobile-friendly with basic accessibility features. No CMS or hosting provider information is discernible from the HTML. Performance appears moderate but no explicit speed metrics are available. The lack of security headers and incomplete WHOIS data represent technical risks. Overall, the technical implementation is basic and could be modernized and hardened for better security and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with goddess.me. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review goddess.me.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.