Skip to main content

Security report for go-mobile-marketing.com

Go Mobile Marketing L.L.C. · Technology · N/a

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

30/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Go Mobile Marketing L.L.C. is a small local digital marketing agency specializing in online advertising, web design, SEO, PPC, ecommerce, and social marketing services primarily targeting businesses in the Chicago area. The website presents a professional portfolio and client references, indicating a focus on personalized service and quality design. Technically, the site uses legacy JavaScript libraries such as jQuery 1.7.2 and includes Google Analytics for tracking, but lacks modern security features such as HTTPS and security headers. The absence of HTTPS is a critical security gap that exposes users to potential data interception risks. Privacy compliance is minimal, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism or GDPR indicators. Contact information is limited to a multi-step form without explicit email or phone contacts. Overall, the site is functional and moderately optimized but requires significant security and privacy improvements to meet modern standards.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  4. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  5. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching go-mobile-marketing.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
28
Average
30

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates as a small service provider in the technology sector, focusing on digital marketing and web development services. Its market position is that of a boutique agency offering customized solutions rather than mass-market templates. Revenue streams likely derive from project-based web design, SEO campaigns, PPC management, and ecommerce implementations. The presence of client portfolios and social media links suggests active marketing and client engagement. The business model is service-oriented with a local/regional focus. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified. The use of privacy protection in domain registration is typical for small businesses seeking to protect personal information. The company’s digital presence is consistent with a small agency but lacks advanced technical maturity.

Security posture

The website’s security posture is weak due to the lack of HTTPS, absence of security headers, and use of outdated JavaScript libraries. These factors increase the risk of data interception, cross-site scripting, and other common web vulnerabilities. No incident response or security policy information is provided, indicating low maturity in security governance. The site does not implement cookie consent or GDPR compliance mechanisms, which may expose it to regulatory risks. While no explicit vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected, the security baseline is insufficient for protecting user data and maintaining trust. Immediate remediation of HTTPS and security headers is recommended.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all site traffic.
  2. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Update all JavaScript libraries to current, secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  4. Introduce a cookie consent banner and update privacy policy to reflect GDPR compliance.
  5. Provide explicit contact information including company email and phone number to improve trust and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Go Mobile Marketing L.L.C.
Description
We set up and manage online marketing campaigns including web site, logo and graphic design, paid advertising, online ecommerce store fronts, social marketing and more.
Key services
Web design, Search engine optimization (SEO), Pay-per-click advertising (PPC), E-commerce site development, Social marketing, Graphic design
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.7.2, Google Analytics (ga.js), Modernizr, PrettyPhoto, SlideDeck, WOWSlider
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of form with hidden fields for email recipient and redirect
  • No visible exposed credentials

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges
  2. No HTTPS detected, which is a critical security issue
  3. Privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism
  4. Contact information only via form, no explicit email or phone found
  5. Use of outdated JavaScript libraries may pose security risks
  6. Social media presence on Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn
  7. Basic SEO and accessibility features present
  8. No visible security headers or advanced security policies
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a legacy technology stack including jQuery 1.7.2, Google Analytics (ga.js), Modernizr, PrettyPhoto, SlideDeck, and WOWSlider. The HTML structure is valid and includes meta tags for SEO, but lacks modern CMS or frameworks. Performance is moderate with some mobile optimization but could be improved. Accessibility features are basic. The site is hosted on an unknown provider with no visible CDN or advanced hosting technologies. Technical debt is evident in outdated libraries and missing HTTPS. Modernization opportunities include upgrading libraries, implementing HTTPS, and enhancing accessibility and SEO features. Technical risks include potential exploitation of outdated scripts and lack of encryption.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with go-mobile-marketing.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review go-mobile-marketing.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.