Skip to main content

Security report for go.link

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website at go.link is currently inaccessible, presenting only a minimal 'Url not found' message. This lack of content prevents any meaningful analysis of the business operations, services, or user engagement. The domain is registered with Gandi SAS since 2017 and is valid until 2026, indicating a legitimate registration history but no active website presence. The absence of metadata, forms, or contact information suggests the site is either under development, deprecated, or blocked. From a technical perspective, no technologies, frameworks, or CMS platforms could be identified due to the lack of content. DNS is managed via NS1 name servers, but DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a minor security shortfall. No security headers or HTTPS status could be verified, and no analytics or advertising scripts were detected. Security posture is weak due to the absence of visible security controls, policies, or compliance documentation. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are present, and no contact or incident response information is available. The domain registration is consistent and not privacy protected, but the lack of website content and security best practices reduces trustworthiness. Overall, the website scores very low on content quality, technical implementation, security posture, privacy compliance, and business credibility. Strategic recommendations include establishing a functional website with proper security and privacy policies, enabling HTTPS and security headers, and providing clear contact and incident response information to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching go.link

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
55
Email security
50
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the absence of website content, no business intelligence data such as market positioning, competitive advantages, or business model insights can be derived. The domain age suggests the potential for an established business, but no evidence supports active operations or services. No partnerships, subsidiaries, or revenue streams are identifiable. The lack of digital presence indicates either a placeholder domain or a site under construction.

Security posture

The current security posture is minimal to non-existent based on available data. No HTTPS or security headers information is available, and DNSSEC is not enabled. No privacy or cookie policies are published, and no incident response contacts are provided. The domain status includes clientTransferProhibited, which is a positive control against unauthorized transfers. Overall, the site lacks fundamental security and compliance measures, increasing risk exposure.

Recommendations

  1. Establish a functional website with meaningful content and metadata.
  2. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enable security headers.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies to ensure compliance.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security incident response channels.
  5. Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and integrity.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. Website content is minimal with only 'Url not found' message, indicating a 404 or blocked content. No WAF vendor identified but content is inaccessible. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is inaccessible or missing
  2. No metadata, no forms, no external links detected
  3. No contact or policy information available
  4. Domain registration is valid and consistent but website lacks substance
  5. No security headers or HTTPS information available
  6. No analytics or advertising scripts detected
  7. No social media or business information found
Technical notes

Notes

The website currently serves only a minimal HTML page with a 'Url not found' message, indicating a 404 error or blocked content. No scripts, libraries, or CMS platforms are detectable. DNS is managed by NS1 name servers, but DNSSEC is not enabled. No performance, accessibility, or SEO optimizations can be assessed. The lack of content and metadata suggests the site is either inactive or under development, representing a technical risk for business continuity and user trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 64/100Medium32 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with go.link. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review go.link.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.