Skip to main content

Security report for go.id

Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia · Government · Indonesia

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, DNS health and 3 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.dpr.go.id represents the official Indonesian House of Representatives, a key government legislative institution. However, the website content is currently inaccessible due to a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or security mechanism, likely provided by Akamai's edgesuite.net service. This blocking prevents access to any substantive content, metadata, or contact information, limiting the ability to perform a full technical and security analysis. The domain registration data confirms the legitimacy and consistency of the site as a government entity in Indonesia. Due to the blocked content, the website's technical infrastructure, security posture, and compliance status cannot be fully evaluated. The site does not contain any adult or questionable content and is safe from a content safety perspective.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • Critical

      DNS Resolution Failed

      Unable to resolve domain A records

      What to do: Verify domain is properly configured and not expired

    • Critical

      Domain Expired

      Domain expired 9059 days ago

      What to do: Renew domain registration immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  4. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching go.id

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
60
Email security
60
DNS health
0
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
58
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired · found on this site
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention go.id, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for go.id right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Indonesian House of Representatives operates as a government entity providing legislative information and public services to Indonesian citizens and stakeholders. The website serves as a portal for legislative news, documents, and updates. The business model is non-commercial, focused on transparency and public service. The domain is enterprise-sized, reflecting a national government institution. No additional business partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the data. The website's market position is authoritative within the Indonesian government sector. Due to the lack of accessible content, insights into digital maturity and user engagement are limited.

Security posture

The current security posture cannot be fully assessed due to the WAF blocking access to the website content. No security headers or SSL configuration details are available. The presence of a WAF indicates some level of security control, but the lack of visible security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosures suggests gaps in transparency and user trust. The site should improve by publishing clear security and privacy policies and ensuring accessibility for legitimate users while maintaining protection against threats.

Recommendations

  1. Work with the hosting and security provider to allow legitimate access for security and compliance assessments.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy, cookie, and security policies on accessible pages.
  3. Implement and expose standard security headers and ensure HTTPS is properly configured.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security incident response channels.
  5. Enhance website content quality and accessibility to improve user experience and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. Access Denied page served by Akamai edgesuite.net indicating WAF or security blocking. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Company
Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia
Description
The website represents the official Indonesian House of Representatives (Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia), a government legislative body.
Key services
Legislative information dissemination, Public access to government documents, Legislative news and updates
Content quality
poor

Technology

Analytics and tracking

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is inaccessible due to WAF or security restrictions.
  2. No metadata, forms, scripts, or business contact information available from the HTML content.
  3. WHOIS data confirms legitimate government ownership.
  4. No privacy, cookie, or security policies found due to blocked content.
  5. No analytics or advertising technologies detected.
  6. Content safety is rated safe with no adult or questionable content.
  7. Technical and security posture cannot be fully assessed due to lack of accessible content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted behind Akamai's content delivery and security network, which currently blocks access resulting in an 'Access Denied' page. No CMS, frameworks, or client-side technologies are detectable from the provided HTML. The lack of metadata, scripts, or forms indicates minimal or no accessible content. Performance, SEO, and accessibility cannot be evaluated. The technical infrastructure appears to rely on a strong CDN and WAF solution, but this also restricts content availability for analysis and user access.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with go.id. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review go.id.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.