Skip to main content

Security report for gnosisfaucet.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website gnosisfaucet.com appears to be a parked or placeholder domain with minimal content and no substantive business information. It primarily serves ads via Google Adsense and Bodis syndicated search, indicating monetization of domain traffic rather than an active business. The lack of WHOIS data and registrant information further suggests the domain is either unregistered, privacy protected, or not actively managed by a legitimate entity. Technically, the site uses basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with no advanced frameworks or CMS detected. Security posture is weak with no security headers or privacy compliance mechanisms implemented. Overall, the site presents a low trust profile with minimal business credibility and poor content quality.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gnosisfaucet.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
20
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

There is no identifiable business entity or operational model behind the domain. The site does not provide contact information, company details, or services. Its market positioning is non-existent, likely serving as a domain parking page monetized through advertising networks. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident. The target audience is general web users who may land on the domain by chance. There are no growth indicators or strategic business insights available.

Security posture

The security posture is minimal. The site uses HTTPS but lacks security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or HSTS. No forms or user inputs reduce attack surface but also limit functionality. There is no evidence of incident response policies, vulnerability disclosures, or data protection officers. Privacy compliance is poor with no cookie consent or GDPR indicators. The absence of WHOIS data and registrant transparency raises concerns about legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish clear WHOIS registration data to improve transparency and trust.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  3. Introduce security headers and enforce HTTPS site-wide to enhance security posture.
  4. Provide clear business contact information and security incident response details.
  5. Develop substantive website content to improve professionalism, user experience, and trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website appears to be a parked domain or placeholder page with no substantive business description or services offered.
Content quality
basic
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Adsense, Bodis Syndicated Search
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adsense, Bodis
Tracking pixels
Google Adsense
Marketing tools
Bodis Syndicated Search
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a parked domain or placeholder with minimal content.
  2. No business or contact information provided.
  3. No WHOIS data available for domain or subdomain.
  4. Uses Google Adsense and Bodis for monetization and related search ads.
  5. No security headers or advanced security measures detected.
  6. No privacy or cookie consent mechanisms implemented.
  7. No forms or user input fields present.
  8. No social media or external business links found.
  9. No evidence of GDPR compliance or security policies.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript and relies on third-party ad networks for monetization. There is no CMS or advanced framework detected. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization or accessibility features. The site is mobile responsive at a basic level but lacks SEO optimization beyond minimal meta tags. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not discernible. The technical implementation is minimal and suitable only for a parked domain or placeholder site.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gnosisfaucet.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gnosisfaucet.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.